IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2019i1p153-d301566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Digital Treatment the Holy Grail? Literature Review on Computerized and Blended Treatment for Depressive Disorders in Youth

Author

Listed:
  • Sanne P. A. Rasing

    (Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, GGZ Oost Brabant, P.O. Box 3, 5427 ZG Boekel, The Netherlands)

  • Yvonne A. J. Stikkelbroek

    (Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, GGZ Oost Brabant, P.O. Box 3, 5427 ZG Boekel, The Netherlands)

  • Denise H. M. Bodden

    (Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Developmental Psychopathology, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Computerized and blended treatments seem to be an attractive treatment for adolescents as an alternative to face-to-face treatment, but mental health professionals seem hesitant to use these treatment modalities. This review provides an overview of factors contributing to and withholding from using computerized or blended treatment in routine care. Three databases were searched with terms related to (1) adolescents, (2) depression, (3) computerized or blended, and (4) treatment. Of the 33 articles identified, 10 focused on unguided computerized treatments, six on guided, two on blended, two compared unguided, blended- and face-to-face treatment to no treatment, and eight studies on games. Further, two articles that were focused on an online monitoring tool and three on intervention characteristics or preferred modes of help-seeking. Evidence for effectiveness, adherence, drop-out, and forming therapeutic relations were suspected to be barriers, but are no reason to reject computerized or blended treatment. Improvement in mental health literacy and the possibility to tailor the intervention are facilitators. However, adolescents’ intention to seek help, acceptability of computerized treatment, symptom severity, time spent by therapist, and other facilities are identified as barriers and they need to be taken into account when using computerized or blended interventions. Nevertheless, computerized and blended are promising treatments for depressed youth.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanne P. A. Rasing & Yvonne A. J. Stikkelbroek & Denise H. M. Bodden, 2019. "Is Digital Treatment the Holy Grail? Literature Review on Computerized and Blended Treatment for Depressive Disorders in Youth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:153-:d:301566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Daniel Ebert & Anna-Carlotta Zarski & Helen Christensen & Yvonne Stikkelbroek & Pim Cuijpers & Matthias Berking & Heleen Riper, 2015. "Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Youth: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Outcome Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nick Midgley & Brenda Guerrero-Tates & Rose Mortimer & Julian Edbrooke-Childs & Jakob Mechler & Karin Lindqvist & Susan Hajkowski & Liat Leibovich & Peter Martin & Gerhard Andersson & George Vlaescu &, 2021. "The Depression: Online Therapy Study (D:OTS)—A Pilot Study of an Internet-Based Psychodynamic Treatment for Adolescents with Low Mood in the UK, in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Christina Gallinat & Markus Moessner & Sandra Apondo & Philipp A. Thomann & Sabine C. Herpertz & Stephanie Bauer, 2021. "Feasibility of an Intervention Delivered via Mobile Phone and Internet to Improve the Continuity of Care in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Harald Baumeister & Yannik Terhorst & Cora Grässle & Maren Freudenstein & Rüdiger Nübling & David Daniel Ebert, 2020. "Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Gretchen J. Bjornstad & Shreya Sonthalia & Benjamin Rouse & Luke Timmons & Laura Whybra & Nick Axford, 2020. "PROTOCOL: A comparison of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural interventions based on delivery features for elevated symptoms of depression in adolescents," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), March.
    5. Braciszewski, Jordan M. & Tzilos Wernette, Golfo K. & Moore, Roland S. & Bock, Beth C. & Stout, Robert L. & Chamberlain, Patricia, 2018. "A pilot randomized controlled trial of a technology-based substance use intervention for youth exiting foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 466-476.
    6. Daniel Núñez & Jorge Gaete & Daniela Meza & Javiera Andaur & Jo Robinson, 2022. "Testing the Effectiveness of a Blended Intervention to Reduce Suicidal Ideation among School Adolescents in Chile: A Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Matilda Berg & Gerhard Andersson & Alexander Rozental, 2020. "Knowledge About Treatment, Anxiety, and Depression in Association With Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents: Development and Initial Evaluation of a New Test," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    8. Sanne P.A. Rasing & Yvonne A.J. Stikkelbroek & Wouter den Hollander & Heleen Riper & Maja Deković & Maaike H. Nauta & Daan H.M. Creemers & Marianne C.P. Immink & Mariken Spuij & Denise H.M. Bodden, 2021. "Pragmatic Quasi-Experimental Controlled Trial Evaluating the Outcomes of Blended CBT Compared to Face-to-Face CBT and Treatment as Usual for Adolescents with Depressive Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Keya Ding & Hui Li, 2023. "Digital Addiction Intervention for Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:153-:d:301566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.