IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i22p4480-d286707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping the Status of Healthcare Improvement Science through a Narrative Review in Six European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Lillo-Crespo

    (Nursing Department and International Mobility Coordinator, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Carretera de San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain)

  • Maria Cristina Sierras-Davó

    (Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Carretera de San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain)

  • Alan Taylor

    (Department of Social, Therapeutic and Community Studies, Coventry University, Gosford St, Coventry CV1 5DL, UK)

  • Katrina Ritters

    (Coventry University, Gosford St, Coventry CV1 5DL, UK)

  • Aimilia Karapostoli

    (Department of Nursing, University of Peloponnese, Tripoli 22100, Greece)

Abstract

With the aim to explore how improvement science is understood, taught, practiced, and its impact on quality healthcare across Europe, the Improvement Science Training for European Healthcare Workers (ISTEW) project “Improvement Science Training for European Healthcare Workers” was funded by the European Commission and integrated by 7 teams from different European countries. As part of the project, a narrative literature review was conducted between 2008 and 2019, including documents in all partners’ languages from 26 databases. Data collection and analysis involved a common database. Validation took place through partners’ discussions. Referring to healthcare improvement science (HIS), a variety of terms, tools, and techniques were reported with no baseline definition or specific framework. All partner teams were informed about the non-existence of a specific term equivalent to HIS in their mother languages, except for the English-speaking countries. A lack of consensus, regarding the understanding and implementation of HIS into the healthcare and educational contexts was found. Our findings have brought to light the gap existing in HIS within Europe, far from other nations, such as the US, where there is a clearer HIS picture. As a consequence, the authors suggest further developing the standardization of HIS understanding and education in Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Lillo-Crespo & Maria Cristina Sierras-Davó & Alan Taylor & Katrina Ritters & Aimilia Karapostoli, 2019. "Mapping the Status of Healthcare Improvement Science through a Narrative Review in Six European Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4480-:d:286707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4480/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4480/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ion VERBONCU & Roxana GANESCU, 2010. "Hospital Performances, A Key Component As Part Of The Health Reform Process From Romania," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(1), pages 38-52, June.
    2. repec:rom:campco:v:6:y:2010:i:1:p:38-52 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Lisa A. Robinson & Jonathan I. Levy, 2011. "The [R]Evolving Relationship Between Risk Assessment and Risk Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(9), pages 1334-1344, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Cristina Sierras-Davo & Manuel Lillo-Crespo & Patricia Verdu & Aimilia Karapostoli, 2021. "Transforming the Future Healthcare Workforce across Europe through Improvement Science Training: A Qualitative Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-8, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeffrey Grogger & Sean Gupta & Ria Ivandic & Tom Kirchmaier, 2021. "Comparing Conventional and Machine‐Learning Approaches to Risk Assessment in Domestic Abuse Cases," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 90-130, March.
    2. Celia Dana BESCIU, 2013. "Personnel Satisfaction Study regarding the Emergency Medical Services’ Quality of Bucharest Hospitals," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2013(21), pages 71-83, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4480-:d:286707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.