IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i1p147-d195535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adolescent Support for Tobacco Control Policies and Associations with Tobacco Denormalization Beliefs and Harm Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Jianjiu Chen

    (School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Sai Yin Ho

    (School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Lok Tung Leung

    (School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Man Ping Wang

    (School of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Tai Hing Lam

    (School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Public support is crucial for advancing tobacco control policies. We investigated adolescent support for such policies, and its association with potential factors of social denormalization (SD) beliefs of smoking, tobacco industry denormalization (TID) beliefs (negative perceptions of the industry), and harm perceptions of smoking. In a cross-sectional survey in Hong Kong, 13,964 secondary school students (mean age 15.0 years, 51.3% boys) reported their support (yes/no) for each of 14 tobacco control policies (e.g., further increase tobacco tax). Tobacco-related beliefs and perceptions, and smoking status were also measured. Support for the 14 tobacco control policies ranged from 17.6% to 54.1%. In current non-smokers, SD beliefs, TID beliefs, and harm perceptions were all associated with support for all tobacco control policies. In current smokers, the study factors were each associated with support for two to three policies. To conclude, support for tobacco control policies was weak to moderate in Hong Kong adolescents. SD beliefs, TID beliefs, and harm perceptions of smoking were associated with policy support in current non-smokers. In current smokers, the corresponding associations were less consistent or weaker.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianjiu Chen & Sai Yin Ho & Lok Tung Leung & Man Ping Wang & Tai Hing Lam, 2019. "Adolescent Support for Tobacco Control Policies and Associations with Tobacco Denormalization Beliefs and Harm Perceptions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:147-:d:195535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/147/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/147/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rose, S.W. & Emery, S.L. & Ennett, S. & Reyes, H.L.M. & Scott, J.C. & Ribisl, K.M., 2015. "Public support for family smoking prevention and tobacco control act point-of-sale provisions: Results of a national study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(10), pages 60-67.
    2. Heiser, P.F. & Begay, M.E., 1997. "The campaign to raise the tobacco tax in Massachusetts," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(6), pages 968-973.
    3. Lok Tung Leung & Sai Yin Ho & Jianjiu Chen & Man Ping Wang & Tai Hing Lam, 2018. "Favourable Perceptions of Electronic Cigarettes Relative to Cigarettes and the Associations with Susceptibility to Electronic Cigarette Use in Hong Kong Chinese Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Page D. Dobbs & Jason B. Colditz & Shelby Shields & Anna Meadows & Brian A. Primack, 2022. "Policy and Behavior: Comparisons between Twitter Discussions about the US Tobacco 21 Law and Other Age-Related Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah D Kowitt & Seth M Noar & Leah M Ranney & Adam O Goldstein, 2017. "Public attitudes toward larger cigarette pack warnings: Results from a nationally representative U.S. sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Goldman, Lisa K. MPP & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 1998. "Tobacco Industry Political Expenditures and Tobacco Policy Making in Oregon: 1985-1997," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt7r2969ks, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    3. Allison M. Schmidt & Sarah D. Kowitt & Allison E. Myers & Adam O. Goldstein, 2018. "Attitudes towards Potential New Tobacco Control Regulations among U.S. Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, January.
    4. Avishai, Aya & Ribisl, Kurt M. & Sheeran, Paschal, 2023. "Realizing the Tobacco Endgame: Understanding and mobilizing public support for banning combustible cigarette sales in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    5. Andrea Soong & Ana Navas-Acien & Yuanjie Pang & Maria Jose Lopez & Esther Garcia-Esquinas & Frances A. Stillman, 2016. "A Cross-Sectional Study of Tobacco Advertising, Promotion, and Sponsorship in Airports across Europe and the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-9, September.
    6. Antoine Genest-Grégoire & Étienne Charbonneau & Daniel E. Bromberg, 2018. "The Sustainability Assumption in Performance Management Reforms: Revisiting the Patterns of Implementation," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 525-542, December.
    7. Seung Hee Kim & Seo Young Kang & Hong-Jun Cho, 2020. "Beliefs about the Harmfulness of Heated Tobacco Products Compared with Combustible Cigarettes and Their Effectiveness for Smoking Cessation among Korean Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-10, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:147-:d:195535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.