IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i14p2466-d247446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facilitating Community Risk Communication for Wide-Area Evacuation during Large-Scale Floods

Author

Listed:
  • Takeyasu Suzuki

    (Disaster and Environmentally Sustainable Administration Research Center, University of Yamanashi, Kofu City, Yamanashi 400-8511, Japan)

  • Takanori Watanabe

    (Sanpoh Co., Ltd., Kai City, Yamanashi 400-0111, Japan)

  • Shin’ichiro Okuyama

    (Civil and Environmental Engineering Course, Integrated Graduate School of Medicine, Engineering and Agricultural Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Kofu City, Yamanashi 400-8511, Japan)

Abstract

Large-scale floods have been occurring more frequently in Japan as a result of current global weather anomalies, yet evacuation procedures face several issues. These include low evacuation rates of citizens, wide-area evacuation by car, and residents who cannot evacuate on their own. For example, in the Kofu Basin, Yamanashi Prefecture, due to the size of the potential inundation area and a population that exceeds 300,000 people spread across 10 municipalities, a large number of residents would have to evacuate across municipal boundaries by car. The author proposed and applied a risk communication method to the Riverside District, Chuo City (with about 1400 households and a population of about 4000), assisting in developing a community disaster management plan for wide-area evacuation without a single victim in case of floods, which has been in place for three years. The next step was risk communication to key stakeholders, such as national, prefectural, and municipal governments. Finally, a public symposium on large-scale evacuation in the Kofu Basin was held. During the panel discussion with representatives of the Kofu River and National Road Office, prefectural government of Yamanashi, the municipality, community residents, and the author as panelists, the role of each stakeholder in area-wide evacuation was clarified and confirmed.

Suggested Citation

  • Takeyasu Suzuki & Takanori Watanabe & Shin’ichiro Okuyama, 2019. "Facilitating Community Risk Communication for Wide-Area Evacuation during Large-Scale Floods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:14:p:2466-:d:247446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/14/2466/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/14/2466/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine E. Rowan, 1994. "Why Rules for Risk Communication Are Not Enough: A Problem‐Solving Approach to Risk Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 365-374, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Atsuko Nonomura & Kazuhito Fujisawa & Mari Takahashi & Hideo Matsumoto & Shuichi Hasegawa, 2020. "Analysis of the Actions and Motivations of a Community during the 2017 Torrential Rains in Northern Kyushu, Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew S. VanDyke & Andy J. King, 2018. "Using the CAUSE Model to Understand Public Communication about Water Risks: Perspectives from Texas Groundwater District Officials on Drought and Availability," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(7), pages 1378-1389, July.
    2. C. Natalie van der Wal & Daniel Formolo & Mark A. Robinson & Steven Gwynne, 2021. "Examining Evacuee Response to Emergency Communications with Agent-Based Simulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    3. McCarthy, Mary & Brennan, Mary, 2009. "Food risk communication: Some of the problems and issues faced by communicators on the Island of Ireland (IOI)," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 549-556, December.
    4. Cynthia G. Jardine & Steve E. Hrudey, 1997. "Mixed Messages in Risk Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 489-498, August.
    5. Annesi, Nora & Battaglia, Massimo & Frey, Marco, 2021. "Stakeholder engagement by an Italian water utility company: Insight from participant observation of dialogism," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Branden B. Johnson, 2003. "Communicating Air Quality Information: Experimental Evaluation of Alternative Formats," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 91-103, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:14:p:2466-:d:247446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.