Author
Listed:
- Claudia Strugnell
(Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)
- Liliana Orellana
(Biostatistics Unit, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)
- Joshua Hayward
(Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)
- Lynne Millar
(Australian Health Policy Collaboration, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 8001, Australia
Australian Institute of Musculoskeletal Science, The University of Melbourne and Western Health, St Albans, VIC 3021, Australia)
- Boyd Swinburn
(Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand)
- Steven Allender
(Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)
Abstract
Background: Tracking population trends in childhood obesity and identifying target areas for prevention requires accurate prevalence data. This study quantified the magnitude of non-participation bias for mean Body Mass Index-z scores and overweight/obesity prevalence associated with low (opt-in) compared to high (opt-out) participation consent methodologies. Methods: Data arose from all Local Government Areas (LGAs) participating in the Healthy Together Victoria Childhood Obesity Study, Australia. Primary schools were randomly selected in 2013 and 2014 and all Grades 4 and 6 students (aged approx. 9–12 years) were invited to participate via opt-in consent (2013) and opt-out consent (2014). For the opt-in wave N = 38 schools (recruitment rate (RR) 24.3%) and N = 856 students participated (RR 36.3%). For the opt-out wave N = 47 schools (RR 32%) and N = 2557 students participated (RR 86.4%). Outcomes: differences between opt-in and opt-out sample estimates (bias) for mean BMI-z, prevalence of overweight/obesity and obesity (alone). Standardized bias (Std bias) estimates defined as bias/standard error are reported for BMI-z. Results : The results demonstrate strong evidence of non-participation bias for mean BMI-z overall (Std bias = −4.5, p < 0.0001) and for girls (Std bias = −5.4, p < 0.0001), but not for boys (Std bias = −1.1, p = 0.15). The opt-in strategy underestimated the overall population prevalence of overweight/obesity and obesity by −5.4 and −4.5 percentage points respectively ( p < 0.001 for both). Significant underestimation was seen in girls, but not for boys. Conclusions: Opt-in consent underestimated prevalence of childhood obesity, particularly in girls. Prevalence, monitoring and community intervention studies on childhood obesity should move to opt-out consent processes for better scientific outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Claudia Strugnell & Liliana Orellana & Joshua Hayward & Lynne Millar & Boyd Swinburn & Steven Allender, 2018.
"Active (Opt-In) Consent Underestimates Mean BMI-z and the Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity Compared to Passive (Opt-Out) Consent. Evidence from the Healthy Together Victoria and Childhood Obesity ,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:747-:d:140958
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:747-:d:140958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.