IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2016i1p1-d85939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospective Cohort Study to Elucidate the Correlation between Occupational Stress and Hypertension Risk in Oil Workers from Kelamayi City in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China

Author

Listed:
  • Rong Li

    (Department of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xiaoyan Gao

    (Department of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Bo Liu

    (Department of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China
    The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hua Ge

    (Department of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Li Ning

    (Department of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Junling Zhao

    (Department of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Jiwen Liu

    (Department of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the major risk factors for hypertension in oil workers, and investigate the effect of occupational stress on the incidence of hypertension after controlling for other risk factors. A prospective cohort approach was used following enrollment of 1354 oil workers. The occupational stress experienced by oil workers was higher than for the general population in China. By the end of the cohort study, 231 new cases of hypertension among the oil workers had been diagnosed. The cumulative incidence of hypertension was 17.06%. There were 44, 112, and 75 workers who developed hypertension in the low, intermediate, and high occupational stress groups, which represented a 12.0%, 15.6%, and 20.3% cumulative incidence, respectively (chi-square value = 9.812, p < 0.01). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed that type of work, cigarette smoking, excess body weight, and obesity were risk factors for hypertension ( p < 0.05). After risk factors such as type of work, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and body mass index (BMI) were controlled, the hypertension risk (hazard ratio, HR) in the high occupational stress group was 1.549 (1.072–2.236) compared to the low exposure group, and 2.337 (1.191–4.585) in female subjects. Our study indicated that an increase in occupational stress was associated with an increased risk of hypertension after other factors were adjusted.

Suggested Citation

  • Rong Li & Xiaoyan Gao & Bo Liu & Hua Ge & Li Ning & Junling Zhao & Jiwen Liu, 2016. "Prospective Cohort Study to Elucidate the Correlation between Occupational Stress and Hypertension Risk in Oil Workers from Kelamayi City in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2016:i:1:p:1-:d:85939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schulte, P.A. & Pandalai, S. & Wulsin, V. & Chun, H.K., 2012. "Interaction of occupational and personal risk factors in workforce health and safety," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(3), pages 434-448.
    2. Guimont, C. & Brisson, C. & Dagenais, G.R. & Milot, A. & Vézina, M. & Mâsse, B. & Moisan, J. & Laflamme, N. & Blanchette, C., 2006. "Effects of job strain on blood pressure: A prospective study of male and female white-collar workers," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(8), pages 1436-1443.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mary A. Fox & Richard Todd Niemeier & Naomi Hudson & Miriam R. Siegel & Gary Scott Dotson, 2021. "Cumulative Risks from Stressor Exposures and Personal Risk Factors in the Workplace: Examples from a Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Aviroop Biswas & Colette N. Severin & Peter M. Smith & Ivan A. Steenstra & Lynda S. Robson & Benjamin C. Amick, 2018. "Larger Workplaces, People-Oriented Culture, and Specific Industry Sectors Are Associated with Co-Occurring Health Protection and Wellness Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Richard Todd Niemeier & Pamela R.D. Williams & Alan Rossner & Jane E. Clougherty & Glenn E. Rice, 2020. "A Cumulative Risk Perspective for Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Luciana Fernandes Portela & Lucia Rotenberg & Ana Luiza Pereira Almeida & Paul Landsbergis & Rosane Harter Griep, 2013. "The Influence of Domestic Overload on the Association between Job Strain and Ambulatory Blood Pressure among Female Nursing Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Leidjaira Lopes Juvanhol & Enirtes Caetano Prates Melo & Marilia Sá Carvalho & Dóra Chor & José Geraldo Mill & Rosane Härter Griep, 2017. "Job Strain and Casual Blood Pressure Distribution: Looking beyond the Adjusted Mean and Taking Gender, Age, and Use of Antihypertensives into Account. Results from ELSA-Brasil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, April.
    6. José Joaquín Del Pozo-Antúnez & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Francisco Fernández-Navarro & Horacio Molina-Sánchez, 2018. "Effect of a Job Demand-Control-Social Support Model on Accounting Professionals’ Health Perception," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Sorensen, Glorian & Dennerlein, Jack T. & Peters, Susan E. & Sabbath, Erika L. & Kelly, Erin L. & Wagner, Gregory R., 2021. "The future of research on work, safety, health and wellbeing: A guiding conceptual framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    8. Hugo Westerlund & Per E Gustafsson & Töres Theorell & Urban Janlert & Anne Hammarström, 2012. "Social Adversity in Adolescence Increases the Physiological Vulnerability to Job Strain in Adulthood: A Prospective Population-Based Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-8, April.
    9. Eva M. Shipp & Sharon P. Cooper & Luohua Jiang & Amber B. Trueblood & Jennifer Ross, 2019. "Influence of Work on Elevated Blood Pressure in Hispanic Adolescents in South Texas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-12, March.
    10. Sarah A. Felknor & Jessica M. K. Streit & Michelle McDaniel & Paul A. Schulte & L. Casey Chosewood & George L. Delclos & on behalf of the Workshop Presenters and Participants, 2021. "How Will the Future of Work Shape OSH Research and Practice? A Workshop Summary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Bonnie Rogers & Anita L. Schill, 2021. "Ethics and Total Worker Health ® : Constructs for Ethical Decision-Making and Competencies for Professional Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Margherita Zito & Emanuela Ingusci & Claudio G. Cortese & Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Amelia Manuti & Monica Molino & Fulvio Signore & Vincenzo Russo, 2021. "Does the End Justify the Means? The Role of Organizational Communication among Work-from-Home Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Ami Sedani & Derry Stover & Brian Coyle & Rajvi J. Wani, 2019. "Assessing Workplace Health and Safety Strategies, Trends, and Barriers through a Statewide Worksite Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    14. Kevin Riley & Holly Wilhalme & Linda Delp & David P. Eisenman, 2018. "Mortality and Morbidity during Extreme Heat Events and Prevalence of Outdoor Work: An Analysis of Community-Level Data from Los Angeles County, California," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2016:i:1:p:1-:d:85939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.