IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i12p1255-d85517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception of Environmental Risks and Health Promotion Attitudes of French Perinatal Health Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Marie

    (EA 4681, PEPRADE, Clermont Université, Université d’Auvergne, 28 Place Henri-Dunant BP 38, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Pôle Santé Publique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, 58 Rue Montalembert, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand CEDEX 1, France)

  • Didier Lémery

    (EA 4681, PEPRADE, Clermont Université, Université d’Auvergne, 28 Place Henri-Dunant BP 38, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Pôle Gynécologie-obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, 58 Rue Montalembert, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand CEDEX 1, France
    Association des Utilisateurs de Dossiers informatisés en Pédiatrie, Obstétrique et Gynécologie (AUDIPOG), RTH Laennec Medical University, 7 rue Guillaume Paradin, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France)

  • Françoise Vendittelli

    (EA 4681, PEPRADE, Clermont Université, Université d’Auvergne, 28 Place Henri-Dunant BP 38, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Pôle Gynécologie-obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, 58 Rue Montalembert, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand CEDEX 1, France
    Association des Utilisateurs de Dossiers informatisés en Pédiatrie, Obstétrique et Gynécologie (AUDIPOG), RTH Laennec Medical University, 7 rue Guillaume Paradin, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France)

  • Marie-Pierre Sauvant-Rochat

    (EA 4681, PEPRADE, Clermont Université, Université d’Auvergne, 28 Place Henri-Dunant BP 38, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Département Santé Publique et Environnement, Faculté de Pharmacie, Clermont Université, Université d’Auvergne, 28 place Henri-Dunant BP 38, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France)

Abstract

The exposure of pregnant women to environmental contaminants is a subject of international concern. However, the risk perception of these contaminants by health professionals (HP) has not been extensively investigated. The main objective of the PERI–HELPE study (Perception of Risk–HEaLth Professionals & Environment Study) was to assess the risk perception of environmental exposure of pregnant women by perinatal HPs. The secondary objectives were to describe the preventive attitudes of perinatal HPs concerning chemicals exposure of pregnant women and to identify the barriers to preventive attitude. A cross-sectional study was performed in 2015 in France. One hundred eighty-nine HPs (obstetricians, midwives, and general practitioners) replied to an online self-administered questionnaire (participation rate: 11%). Carbon monoxide, pesticides and lead were the contaminants most frequently perceived as a high risk for pregnant women. A minority of HPs asked women about their chemical exposure and advised them to reduce exposure. The lack of information, training and scientific evidence in environmental health were the main difficulties declared by the HPs to advise pregnant women. Despite the low response rate, our findings provide important information to encourage French health authorities to take into account the difficulties encountered by HPs and set up appropriate training programs in Environmental health.

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Marie & Didier Lémery & Françoise Vendittelli & Marie-Pierre Sauvant-Rochat, 2016. "Perception of Environmental Risks and Health Promotion Attitudes of French Perinatal Health Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:12:p:1255-:d:85517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/12/1255/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/12/1255/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathrin Röske & Wolfgang Hannöver & Jochen René Thyrian & Ulrich John & Hans-Joachim Hannich, 2009. "Smoking Cessation Counselling for Pregnant and Postpartum Women among Midwives, Gynaecologists and Paediatricians in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff & Jürgen Breckenkamp & Pia Veldt Larsen & Bernd Kowall, 2014. "General Practitioners’ Knowledge and Concern about Electromagnetic Fields," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. C. K. Mertz & Paul Slovic & I. F. H. Purchase, 1998. "Judgments of Chemical Risks: Comparisons Among Senior Managers, Toxicologists, and the Public," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 391-404, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raphaëlle Teysseire & Marion Lecourt & Jim Canet & Guyguy Manangama & Loïc Sentilhes & Fleur Delva, 2019. "Perception of Environmental Risks and Behavioral Changes during Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study of French Postpartum Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Steeve Rouillon & Houria El Ouazzani & Jean-Benoit Hardouin & Line Enjalbert & Sylvie Rabouan & Virginie Migeot & Marion Albouy-Llaty, 2020. "How to Educate Pregnant Women about Endocrine Disruptors?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Marion Albouy-Llaty & Steeve Rouillon & Houria El Ouazzani & Group DisProSE & Sylvie Rabouan & Virginie Migeot, 2019. "Environmental Health Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of French Prenatal Professionals Working with a Socially Underprivileged Population: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-10, July.
    4. Marion Albouy & Maud Parthenay & Maeva Nogues & Agathe Leyris & Léa Degorce & Zacharie Barthelemy & Diana Rafidison & Anne-Sophie Gourgues & Virginie Migeot & Jean Pylouster & Antoine Dupuis, 2022. "A Clinical Preventive Strategy Based on a Digital Tool to Improve Access to Endocrine Disruptors Exposure Prevention: The MEDPREVED Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Houria El Ouazzani & Simon Fortin & Nicolas Venisse & Antoine Dupuis & Steeve Rouillon & Guillaume Cambien & Anne-Sophie Gourgues & Pascale Pierre-Eugène & Sylvie Rabouan & Virginie Migeot & Marion Al, 2021. "Perinatal Environmental Health Education Intervention to Reduce Exposure to Endocrine Disruptors: The PREVED Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-28, December.
    6. Claire Sunyach & Barbara Antonelli & Sophie Tardieu & Michele Marcot & Jeanne Perrin & Florence Bretelle, 2018. "Environmental Health in Perinatal and Early Childhood: Awareness, Representation, Knowledge and Practice of Southern France Perinatal Health Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Raphaëlle Teysseire & Patrick Brochard & Loïc Sentilhes & Fleur Delva, 2019. "Identification and Prioritization of Environmental Reproductive Hazards: A First Step in Establishing Environmental Perinatal Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rita Saleh & Angela Bearth & Michael Siegrist, 2019. "“Chemophobia” Today: Consumers’ Knowledge and Perceptions of Chemicals," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(12), pages 2668-2682, December.
    2. B.R. Orton & L. Sjöberg & J. Jung & D. ürge-Vorsatz & M. Tamássyné-Bíró, 2001. "Risk perception by industrial radiographers: Hungary and the UK compared," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 17-29, January.
    3. Angela Bearth & Linda Miesler & Michael Siegrist, 2017. "Consumers’ Risk Perception of Household Cleaning and Washing Products," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 647-660, April.
    4. Kathleen L. Purvis‐Roberts & Cynthia A. Werner & Irene Frank, 2007. "Perceived Risks from Radiation and Nuclear Testing Near Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan: A Comparison Between Physicians, Scientists, and the Public," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 291-302, April.
    5. Macfarlane, Ronald, 2002. "Integrating the consumer interest in food safety: the role of science and other factors+," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 65-80, February.
    6. Heikkila, Jaakko & Pouta, Eija & Forsman-Hugg, Sari & Makela, Johanna, 2011. "Consumer risk perceptions of zoonotic, chemical and gm risks: the case of poultry purchase intentions in Finland," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114551, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Jaakko Heikkilä & Eija Pouta & Sari Forsman-Hugg & Johanna Mäkelä, 2013. "Heterogeneous Risk Perceptions: The Case of Poultry Meat Purchase Intentions in Finland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:12:p:1255-:d:85517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.