IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i6p5712-5734d50125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Road-Traffic Noise: Annoyance, Risk Perception, and Noise Sensitivity in the Finnish Adult Population

Author

Listed:
  • Enembe Oku Okokon

    (Department of Health Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Neulaniementie 4, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland)

  • Anu W. Turunen

    (Department of Health Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Neulaniementie 4, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland)

  • Sari Ung-Lanki

    (Department of Health Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Neulaniementie 4, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland)

  • Anna-Kaisa Vartiainen

    (Department of Health Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Neulaniementie 4, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland)

  • Pekka Tiittanen

    (Department of Health Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Neulaniementie 4, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland)

  • Timo Lanki

    (Department of Health Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Neulaniementie 4, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland)

Abstract

Exposure to road-traffic noise commonly engenders annoyance, the extent of which is determined by factors not fully understood. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence and determinants of road-traffic noise annoyance and noise sensitivity in the Finnish adult population, while comparing the perceptions of road-traffic noise to exhausts as environmental health problems. Using a questionnaire that yielded responses from 1112 randomly selected adult Finnish respondents, we estimated road-traffic noise- and exhausts-related perceived exposures, health-risk perceptions, and self-reported annoyance on five-point scales, while noise sensitivity estimates were based on four questions. Determinants of noise annoyance and sensitivity were investigated using multivariate binary logistic regression and linear regression models, respectively. High or extreme noise annoyance was reported by 17% of respondents. Noise sensitivity scores approximated a Gaussian distribution. Road-traffic noise and exhausts were, respectively, considered high or extreme population-health risks by 22% and 27% of respondents. Knowledge of health risks from traffic noise, OR: 2.04 (1.09–3.82) and noise sensitivity, OR: 1.07 (1.00–1.14) were positively associated with annoyance. Knowledge of health risks ( p < 0.045) and positive environmental attitudes ( p < 000) were associated with higher noise sensitivity. Age and sex were associated with annoyance and sensitivity only in bivariate models. A considerable proportion of Finnish adults are highly annoyed by road-traffic noise, and perceive it to be a significant health risk, almost comparable to traffic exhausts. There is no distinct noise-sensitive population subgroup. Knowledge of health risks of road-traffic noise, and attitudinal variables are associated with noise annoyance and sensitivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Enembe Oku Okokon & Anu W. Turunen & Sari Ung-Lanki & Anna-Kaisa Vartiainen & Pekka Tiittanen & Timo Lanki, 2015. "Road-Traffic Noise: Annoyance, Risk Perception, and Noise Sensitivity in the Finnish Adult Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:6:p:5712-5734:d:50125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/6/5712/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/6/5712/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Shepherd & David Welch & Kim N. Dirks & Renata Mathews, 2010. "Exploring the Relationship between Noise Sensitivity, Annoyance and Health-Related Quality of Life in a Sample of Adults Exposed to Environmental Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martina S. Ragettli & Sophie Goudreau & Céline Plante & Stéphane Perron & Michel Fournier & Audrey Smargiassi, 2015. "Annoyance from Road Traffic, Trains, Airplanes and from Total Environmental Noise Levels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Paweł Małecki & Małgorzata Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska & Tadeusz Wszołek & Anna Preis & Maciej Kłaczyński & Adam Dudarewicz & Paweł Pawlik & Bartłomiej Stępień & Dominik Mleczko, 2023. "Does Stochastic and Modulated Wind Turbine Infrasound Affect Human Mental Performance Compared to Steady Signals without Modulation? Results of a Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Andrew Mitchell & Mercede Erfanian & Christopher Soelistyo & Tin Oberman & Jian Kang & Robert Aldridge & Jing-Hao Xue & Francesco Aletta, 2022. "Effects of Soundscape Complexity on Urban Noise Annoyance Ratings: A Large-Scale Online Listening Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Janice Hegewald & Melanie Schubert & Alice Freiberg & Karla Romero Starke & Franziska Augustin & Steffi G. Riedel-Heller & Hajo Zeeb & Andreas Seidler, 2020. "Traffic Noise and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Maite Santurtún & María José García Tárrago & Pablo Fdez-Arroyabe & María T. Zarrabeitia, 2022. "Noise Disturbance and Well-Being in the North of Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Javier Dopico & Beat Schäffer & Mark Brink & Martin Röösli & Danielle Vienneau & Tina Maria Binz & Silvia Tobias & Nicole Bauer & Jean Marc Wunderli, 2023. "How Do Road Traffic Noise and Residential Greenness Correlate with Noise Annoyance and Long-Term Stress? Protocol and Pilot Study for a Large Field Survey with a Cross-Sectional Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Peter Preisendörfer & Heidi Bruderer Enzler & Andreas Diekmann & Jörg Hartmann & Karin Kurz & Ulf Liebe, 2022. "Pathways to Environmental Inequality: How Urban Traffic Noise Annoyance Varies across Socioeconomic Subgroups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yalcin Yildirim & Diane Jones Allen & Amy Albright, 2019. "The Relationship between Sound and Amenities of Transit-Oriented Developments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Timothy Van Renterghem & Dick Botteldooren, 2012. "Focused Study on the Quiet Side Effect in Dwellings Highly Exposed to Road Traffic Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Jan Urban & Vojtěch Máca, 2013. "Linking Traffic Noise, Noise Annoyance and Life Satisfaction: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Bożena Mroczek & Joanna Banaś & Małgorzata Machowska-Szewczyk & Donata Kurpas, 2015. "Evaluation of Quality of Life of Those Living near a Wind Farm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Daniel Shepherd & David Welch & Kim N. Dirks & David McBride, 2013. "Do Quiet Areas Afford Greater Health-Related Quality of Life than Noisy Areas?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Jessica Massonnié & Philippe Frasseto & Terry Ng-Knight & Katie Gilligan-Lee & Natasha Kirkham & Denis Mareschal, 2022. "Children’s Effortful Control Skills, but Not Their Prosocial Skills, Relate to Their Reactions to Classroom Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Pengpeng Xie & Yong Peng & Tiantian Wang & Honghao Zhang, 2019. "Risks of Ear Complaints of Passengers and Drivers While Trains Are Passing Through Tunnels at High Speed: A Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Ayoko, Oluremi B. & Ashkanasy, Neal M. & Li, Yiqiong & Dorris, Alana & Jehn, Karen A., 2023. "An experience sampling study of employees’ reactions to noise in the open-plan office," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    9. Robert Thorne & Daniel Shepherd, 2013. "Quiet as an Environmental Value: A Contrast between Two Legislative Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Dirk Schreckenberg & Christin Belke & Jan Spilski, 2018. "The Development of a Multiple-Item Annoyance Scale (MIAS) for Transportation Noise Annoyance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:6:p:5712-5734:d:50125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.