IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v8y2016i2p14-d68595.html

The Evolution of Wikipedia’s Norm Network

Author

Listed:
  • Bradi Heaberlin

    (Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, 1900 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47406, USA
    Department of Political Science, Indiana University, 1100 E 7th St, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA)

  • Simon DeDeo

    (Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, 1900 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47406, USA
    Center for Complex Networks and Systems Research, Department of Informatics, Indiana University, 919 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA
    Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, 513 N Park Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA
    Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA)

Abstract

Social norms have traditionally been difficult to quantify. In any particular society, their sheer number and complex interdependencies often limit a system-level analysis. One exception is that of the network of norms that sustain the online Wikipedia community. We study the fifteen-year evolution of this network using the interconnected set of pages that establish, describe, and interpret the community’s norms. Despite Wikipedia’s reputation for ad hoc governance, we find that its normative evolution is highly conservative. The earliest users create norms that both dominate the network and persist over time. These core norms govern both content and interpersonal interactions using abstract principles such as neutrality, verifiability, and assume good faith. As the network grows, norm neighborhoods decouple topologically from each other, while increasing in semantic coherence. Taken together, these results suggest that the evolution of Wikipedia’s norm network is akin to bureaucratic systems that predate the information age.

Suggested Citation

  • Bradi Heaberlin & Simon DeDeo, 2016. "The Evolution of Wikipedia’s Norm Network," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:14-:d:68595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/8/2/14/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/8/2/14/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erjia Yan & Ying Ding, 2012. "Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(7), pages 1313-1326, July.
    2. Erjia Yan & Ying Ding, 2012. "Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(7), pages 1313-1326, July.
    3. Eleanor R Brush & David C Krakauer & Jessica C Flack, 2013. "A Family of Algorithms for Computing Consensus about Node State from Network Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Caldeira, Gregory A., 1985. "The Transmission of Legal Precedent: A Study of State Supreme Courts," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 79(1), pages 178-194, March.
    5. Joel West & Karim Lakhani, 2008. "Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 223-231.
    6. Brennan,Geoffrey & Buchanan,James M., 2008. "The Reason of Rules," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521070904.
    7. George Akerlof, 1976. "The Economics of Caste and of the Rat Race and Other Woeful Tales," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 90(4), pages 599-617.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon DeDeo, 2016. "Conflict and Computation on Wikipedia: A Finite-State Machine Analysis of Editor Interactions," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Vangelis Papadimitropoulos, 2018. "Reflections on the Contradictions of the Commons," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 317-331, June.
    3. Marc Miquel-Ribé & Cristian Consonni & David Laniado, 2022. "Community Vital Signs: Measuring Wikipedia Communities’ Sustainable Growth and Renewal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-41, April.
    4. Frank Martela, 2023. "Managers matter less than we think: how can organizations function without any middle management?," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(1), pages 19-25, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guan-Can Yang & Gang Li & Chun-Ya Li & Yun-Hua Zhao & Jing Zhang & Tong Liu & Dar-Zen Chen & Mu-Hsuan Huang, 2015. "Using the comprehensive patent citation network (CPC) to evaluate patent value," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1319-1346, December.
    2. An, Lu & Yu, Chuanming & Li, Gang, 2014. "Visual topical analysis of Chinese and American Library and Information Science research institutions," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 217-233.
    3. Nicole Castillo & Roberto D. Ponce Oliva & Julián Andrés Diaz Tautiva, 2024. "Charting the Path: Unraveling the Research on Organizations and Certification Schemes (1999–2022)," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, December.
    4. Yu-Wei Chang & Mu-Hsuan Huang & Chiao-Wen Lin, 2015. "Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2071-2087, December.
    5. Jimi Adams & Ryan Light, 2014. "Mapping Interdisciplinary Fields: Efficiencies, Gaps and Redundancies in HIV/AIDS Research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Aldijana Bunjak & Olivier Zehnder, 2026. "Quantifying the gig economy’s evolution: A bibliometric exploration of historical patterns and future projections," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 36(1), pages 1-26, December.
    7. Dorsa Alipour & Hussein Dia, 2023. "A Systematic Review of the Role of Land Use, Transport, and Energy-Environment Integration in Shaping Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    8. Chakresh Kumar Singh & Demival Vasques Filho & Shivakumar Jolad & Dion R. J. O’Neale, 2020. "Evolution of interdependent co-authorship and citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 385-404, October.
    9. Sung, Kiseo & Park, Kyu-Tae & Lee, Hakyeon, 2024. "Landscaping the digital twin technology: Patent-based networks and technology reference model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    10. Ali Gazni & Vincent Larivière & Fereshteh Didegah, 2016. "The effect of collaborators on institutions’ scientific impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 1209-1230, November.
    11. Jorge S. Rodriguez-Garcia, 2022. "Implications of research on social entrepreneurship in times of COVID-19: a business management approach," Scientia et PRAXIS, AMIDI Editorial, vol. 2(4), pages 38-58, July-Dece.
    12. Bech, Morten L. & Bergstrom, Carl T. & Rosvall, Martin & Garratt, Rodney J., 2015. "Mapping change in the overnight money market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 424(C), pages 44-51.
    13. Yuen-Hsien Tseng & Ming-Yueh Tsay, 2013. "Journal clustering of library and information science for subfield delineation using the bibliometric analysis toolkit: CATAR," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(2), pages 503-528, May.
    14. Pratibha Rai & A. Jiran Meitei & Rajkishan Nair, 2026. "The evolution of research on the middle-income trap: a bibliometric and conceptual review," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 1-32, April.
    15. Wenyuan Liu & Andrea Nanetti & Siew Ann Cheong, 2017. "Knowledge evolution in physics research: An analysis of bibliographic coupling networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Sérgio P. Santos, 2021. "Two decades on the MACBETH approach: a bibliometric analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 901-925, January.
    17. Matias Ramirez & Javier Hernando Garcia Estevez & Oscar Yandy Romero Goyeneche & Claudia E Obando Rodriguez, 2020. "Fostering place-based coalitions between social movements and science for sustainable urban environments: A case of embedded agency," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(7-8), pages 1386-1411, November.
    18. A. Tuncer & F. Gezici, 2024. "Influence of proximities and their interaction effects on scientific collaborations: the case of Turkish regions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(3), pages 1277-1298, March.
    19. Song Yanhui & Wu Lijuan & Qiu Junping, 2021. "A comparative study of first and all-author bibliographic coupling analysis based on Scientometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1125-1147, February.
    20. S. S. Rajkishan & A. Jiran Meitei & Abha Singh, 2024. "Role of AI/ML in the study of mental health problems of the students: a bibliometric study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(5), pages 1615-1637, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:14-:d:68595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.