IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i21p5567-d1777324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Surrogate Modeling Approach for Aggregated Flexibility Envelopes in Transmission–Distribution Coordination: A Case Study on Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Rossi

    (Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico (RSE s.p.a.), Via Rubattino 54, 20134 Milano, Italy)

  • Andrea Pitto

    (Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico (RSE s.p.a.), Via Rubattino 54, 20134 Milano, Italy)

  • Emanuele Ciapessoni

    (Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico (RSE s.p.a.), Via Rubattino 54, 20134 Milano, Italy)

  • Giacomo Viganò

    (Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico (RSE s.p.a.), Via Rubattino 54, 20134 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

The role of distributed energy resources in distribution networks is evolving to support system operation, facilitated by their participation in local flexibility markets. Future scenarios envision a significant share of low-power resources providing ancillary services to efficiently manage network congestions, offering a competitive alternative to conventional grid reinforcement. Additionally, the interaction between distribution and transmission systems enables the provision of flexibility services at higher voltage levels for various applications. In such cases, the aggregated flexibility of low-power resources is typically represented as a capability envelope at the interface between the distribution and transmission network, constructed by accounting for distribution grid constraints and subsequently communicated to the transmission system operator. This paper revisits this concept and introduces a novel approach for envelope construction. The proposed method is based on a surrogate model composed of a limited set of standard power flow components—loads, generators, and storage units—enhancing the integration of distribution network flexibility into transmission-level optimization frameworks. Notably, this advantage can potentially be achieved without significant modifications to the optimization tools currently available to grid operators. The effectiveness of the approach is demonstrated through a case study in which the adoption of distribution network surrogate models within a coordinated framework between transmission and distribution operators enables the provision of ancillary services for transmission resilience support. This results in improved resilience indicators and lower control action costs compared to conventional shedding schemes.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Rossi & Andrea Pitto & Emanuele Ciapessoni & Giacomo Viganò, 2025. "A Surrogate Modeling Approach for Aggregated Flexibility Envelopes in Transmission–Distribution Coordination: A Case Study on Resilience," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-35, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:21:p:5567-:d:1777324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/21/5567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/21/5567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giacomo Viganò & Giorgia Lattanzio & Marco Rossi, 2024. "Review of Main Projects, Characteristics and Challenges in Flexibility Markets for Services Addressed to Electricity Distribution Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Georgios Papazoglou & Pandelis Biskas, 2022. "Review of Methodologies for the Assessment of Feasible Operating Regions at the TSO–DSO Interface," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Marcel Sarstedt & Leonard Kluß & Johannes Gerster & Tobias Meldau & Lutz Hofmann, 2021. "Survey and Comparison of Optimization-Based Aggregation Methods for the Determination of the Flexibility Potentials at Vertical System Interconnections," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georgios Papazoglou & Pandelis Biskas, 2023. "Review and Comparison of Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization in the Optimal Power Flow Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Aguado, José A. & Paredes, Ángel, 2023. "Coordinated and decentralized trading of flexibility products in Inter-DSO Local Electricity Markets via ADMM," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    3. Georgios Papazoglou & Pandelis Biskas, 2022. "Review of Methodologies for the Assessment of Feasible Operating Regions at the TSO–DSO Interface," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Jorge Cano-Martínez & Alfredo Quijano-López & Vicente Fuster-Roig, 2025. "A Scoping Review of Flexibility Markets in the Power Sector: Models, Mechanisms, and Business Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-39, September.
    5. Seunghyuk Im & Jeonghoo Park & Kyungsang Lee & Yongbeom Son & Byongjun Lee, 2024. "Estimation of Quantitative Inertia Requirement Based on Effective Inertia Using Historical Operation Data of South Korea Power System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Đorđe Lazović & Željko Đurišić, 2023. "Advanced Flexibility Support through DSO-Coordinated Participation of DER Aggregators in the Balancing Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Foroughi, Mehdi & Bagherpour, Matin & Eliassen, Frank & Poudineh, Rahmatallah, 2025. "Autonomy as empowerment: A taxonomic framework for analyzing energy autonomy in local flexibility markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 389(C).
    8. Antonino Rollo & Paolo Serafini & Federico Aleotti & Debora Cilio & Enrico Morandini & Diana Moneta & Marco Rossi & Matteo Zulianello & Valerio Angelucci, 2025. "Load Shifting and Demand-Side Management in Renewable Energy Communities: Simulations of Different Technological Configurations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-33, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:21:p:5567-:d:1777324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.