IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i15p4034-d1712599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geological Evaluation of In-Situ Pyrolysis Development of Oil-Rich Coal in Tiaohu Mining Area, Santanghu Basin, Xinjiang, China

Author

Listed:
  • Guangxiu Jing

    (Hydrological and Environmental Geological Survey Center of Geological Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830000, China)

  • Xiangquan Gao

    (Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Geodynamic Processes and Metallogenic Prognosis of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830047, China
    School of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Shuo Feng

    (Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Geodynamic Processes and Metallogenic Prognosis of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830047, China
    School of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Xin Li

    (Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Geodynamic Processes and Metallogenic Prognosis of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830047, China
    School of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Wenfeng Wang

    (Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Geodynamic Processes and Metallogenic Prognosis of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830047, China
    School of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Tianyin Zhang

    (Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Geodynamic Processes and Metallogenic Prognosis of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830047, China
    School of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Chenchen Li

    (Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Geodynamic Processes and Metallogenic Prognosis of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830047, China
    School of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

Abstract

The applicability of the in-situ pyrolysis of oil-rich coal is highly dependent on regional geological conditions. In this study, six major geological factors and 19 key parameters influencing the in-situ pyrolysis of oil-rich coal were systematically identified. An analytic hierarchy process incorporating index classification and quantification was employed in combination with the geological features of the Tiaohu mining area to establish a feasibility evaluation index system suitable for in-situ development in the study region. Among these factors, coal quality parameters (e.g., coal type, moisture content, volatile matter, ash yield), coal seam occurrence characteristics (e.g., seam thickness, burial depth, interburden frequency), and hydrogeological conditions (e.g., relative water inflow) primarily govern pyrolysis process stability. Surrounding rock properties (e.g., roof/floor lithology) and structural features (e.g., fault proximity) directly impact pyrolysis furnace sealing integrity, while environmental geological factors (e.g., hazardous element content in coal) determine environmental risk control effectiveness. Based on actual geological data from the Tiaohu mining area, the comprehensive weight of each index was determined. After calculation, the southwestern, central, and southeastern subregions of the mining area were identified as favorable zones for pyrolysis development. A constraint condition analysis was then conducted, accompanied by a one-vote veto index system, in which the thresholds were defined for coal seam thickness (≥1.5 m), burial depth (≥500 m), thickness variation coefficient (≤15%), fault proximity (≥200 m), tar yield (≥7%), high-pressure permeability (≥10 mD), and high-pressure porosity (≥15%). Following the exclusion of unqualified boreholes, three target zones for pyrolysis furnace deployment were ultimately selected.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangxiu Jing & Xiangquan Gao & Shuo Feng & Xin Li & Wenfeng Wang & Tianyin Zhang & Chenchen Li, 2025. "Geological Evaluation of In-Situ Pyrolysis Development of Oil-Rich Coal in Tiaohu Mining Area, Santanghu Basin, Xinjiang, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:15:p:4034-:d:1712599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/15/4034/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/15/4034/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dianfa Wu & Zhiping Yang & Ningling Wang & Chengzhou Li & Yongping Yang, 2018. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model and AHP Weighting Uncertainty Analysis for Sustainability Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olawale Ogunrinde & Ekundayo Shittu, 2023. "Benchmarking performance of photovoltaic power plants in multiple periods," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 489-503, September.
    2. Marcin Rabe & Dalia Streimikiene & Yuriy Bilan, 2019. "The Concept of Risk and Possibilities of Application of Mathematical Methods in Supporting Decision Making for Sustainable Energy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    3. T. Sivageerthi & Bathrinath Sankaranarayanan & Syed Mithun Ali & Ali AlArjani & Koppiahraj Karuppiah, 2022. "Modeling Challenges for Improving the Heat Rate Performance in a Thermal Power Plant: Implications for SDGs in Energy Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Diankai Wang & Inna Gryshova & Anush Balian & Mykola Kyzym & Tetiana Salashenko & Viktoriia Khaustova & Olexandr Davidyuk, 2022. "Assessment of Power System Sustainability and Compromises between the Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Zenonas Turskis & Nikolaj Goranin & Assel Nurusheva & Seilkhan Boranbayev, 2019. "A Fuzzy WASPAS-Based Approach to Determine Critical Information Infrastructures of EU Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Xiaolong Yang & Dongxiao Niu & Meng Chen & Keke Wang & Qian Wang & Xiaomin Xu, 2020. "An Operation Benefit Analysis and Decision Model of Thermal Power Enterprises in China against the Background of Large-Scale New Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Konstantinos G. Aravossis & Vasilis C. Kapsalis & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Theofanis G. Xouleis, 2019. "Development of a Holistic Assessment Framework for Industrial Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Nima Pirhadi & Xiaowei Tang & Qing Yang & Fei Kang, 2018. "A New Equation to Evaluate Liquefaction Triggering Using the Response Surface Method and Parametric Sensitivity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Mateusz Piwowarski & Danuta Miłaszewicz & Małgorzata Łatuszyńska & Mariusz Borawski & Kesra Nermend, 2018. "Application of the Vector Measure Construction Method and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity Ideal Solution for the Analysis of the Dynamics of Changes in the Poverty Levels in the European ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Payam Khazaelpour & Fausto Cavallaro, 2018. "The Multi-Aspect Criterion in the PMADM Outline and Its Possible Application to Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Ehsan Javanmardi & Sifeng Liu & Naiming Xie, 2020. "Exploring Grey Systems Theory-Based Methods and Applications in Sustainability Studies: A Systematic Review Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, May.
    12. Anu P. Alex & V. S. Manju & V. Hima & Leema Peter, 2023. "Assessment of sustainable mobility indicators for an emerging satellite city in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 10447-10463, September.
    13. Ruxue Shi & Pingtao Yi & Weiwei Li & Qiankun Dong, 2024. "Sustainability evaluation based on the three-stage difference-driven model: a case study of the province, autonomous region, and municipality in Western China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 11881-11911, May.
    14. Liang Wang & Qingbiao Guo & Xuexiang Yu, 2023. "Stability-Level Evaluation of the Construction Site above the Goaf Based on Combination Weighting and Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Helena Gaspars-Wieloch, 2024. "AHP based on scenarios and the optimism coefficient for new and risky projects: case of independent criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(2), pages 937-961, October.
    16. Collins, Benjamin C. & Kumral, Mustafa, 2020. "Game theory for analyzing and improving environmental management in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    17. Alexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti & René Bañares-Alcántara & Eduardo Cleto Pires & Sonia Valle Walter Borges Oliveira, 2022. "A Multi-Criteria and Multi-Agent Framework for supporting complex decision-making processes," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 1025-1050, October.
    18. Li-Ming Chien & Kung-Jen Tu, 2021. "Establishing Merger Feasibility Simulation Model Based on Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Method: Case Study of Taiwan’s Property Management Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, February.
    19. N. Aktaş & N. Demirel, 2021. "A hybrid framework for evaluating corporate sustainability using multi-criteria decision making," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15591-15618, October.
    20. Wioletta Lipka & Cezary Szwed, 2021. "Multi-Attribute Rating Method for Selecting a Clean Coal Energy Generation Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:15:p:4034-:d:1712599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.