IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i14p3735-d1701745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restructuring the Coupling Coordination Mechanism of the Economy–Energy–Environment (3E) System Under the Dual Carbon Emissions Control Policy—An Exploration Based on the “Triangular Trinity” Theoretical Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Xu

    (Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510620, China)

  • Wenxiu Wang

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
    School of Engineering Science-Energy Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Xuwen Yan

    (Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510620, China)

  • Guotian Cai

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
    School of Engineering Science-Energy Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Liping Chen

    (Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510620, China)

  • Haifeng Cen

    (Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510620, China)

  • Zihan Lin

    (Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510620, China)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the profound restructuring in global climate governance, China’s energy management system is undergoing a comprehensive transition from dual energy consumption control to dual carbon emissions control. This policy shift fundamentally alters the underlying logic of energy-focused regulation and inevitably impacts the economy–energy–environment (3E) system. This study innovatively constructs a “Triangular Trinity” theoretical framework integrating internal, intermediate, and external triangular couplings, as well as providing a granular analysis of their transmission relationships and feedback mechanisms. Using Guangdong Province as a case study, this study takes the dual control emissions policy within the external triangle as an entry point to research the restructuring logic of dual carbon emissions control for the coupling coordination mechanisms of the 3E system. The key findings are as follows: (1) Policy efficacy evolution: During 2005–2016, dual energy consumption control significantly improved energy conservation and emissions reduction, elevating Guangdong’s 3E coupling coordination. Post 2017, however, its singular focus on total energy consumption revealed limitations, causing a decline in 3E coordination. Dual carbon emissions control demonstrably enhances 3E systemic synergy. (2) Decoupling dynamics: Dual carbon emissions control accelerates economic–carbon emission decoupling, while slowing economic–energy consumption decoupling. This created an elasticity space of 5.092 million tons of standard coal equivalent (sce) and reduced carbon emissions by 26.43 million tons, enabling high-quality economic development. (3) Mechanism reconstruction: By leveraging external triangular elements (energy-saving technologies and market mechanisms) to act on the energy subsystem, dual carbon emissions control leads to optimal solutions to the “Energy Trilemma”. This drives the systematic restructuring of the sustainability triangle, achieving high-order 3E coupling coordination. The Triangular Trinity framework constructed by us in the paper is an innovative attempt in relation to the theory of energy transition, providing a referenceable methodology for resolving the contradictions of the 3E system. The research results can provide theoretical support and practical reference for the low-carbon energy transition of provinces and cities with similar energy structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Xu & Wenxiu Wang & Xuwen Yan & Guotian Cai & Liping Chen & Haifeng Cen & Zihan Lin, 2025. "Restructuring the Coupling Coordination Mechanism of the Economy–Energy–Environment (3E) System Under the Dual Carbon Emissions Control Policy—An Exploration Based on the “Triangular Trinity” Theoreti," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3735-:d:1701745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3735/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3735/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Banban Wang & Frank Jotzo & Shaozhou Qi, 2018. "Ex-post cap adjustment for China’s ETS: an applicable indexation rule, simulating the Hubei ETS, and implications for a national scheme," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 258-273, February.
    2. Pahle, Michael & Quemin, Simon & Osorio, Sebastian & Günther, Claudia & Pietzcker, Robert, 2025. "The emerging endgame: The EU ETS on the road towards climate neutrality," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Liao, Liping & Kong, Shuning & Du, Minzhe, 2025. "The effect of clean heating policy on individual health: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan, Xiujie & Wang, Banban & Wei, Jie & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2023. "The role of carbon pricing in achieving energy transition in the Post-COP26 era: Evidence from China's industrial energy conservation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Małgorzata Błażejowska & Anna Czarny & Iwona Kowalska & Andrzej Michalczewski & Paweł Stępień, 2025. "The Hedging Strategies of Enterprises in the European Union Allowances Market—Implementation Actions for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-27, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3735-:d:1701745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.