Author
Listed:
- Long Xiao
(National Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)
- Ping Yue
(National Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)
- Hongnan Yang
(National Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)
- Wei Guo
(No.4 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Yulin 719000, China)
- Simin Qu
(National Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Sichuan Changning Natural Gas Development Limited Liability Company, Southwest Oil & Gas Company, PetroChina, Chengdu 610051, China)
- Hui Yao
(National Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)
- Lingqiang Meng
(CNOOC (China) Limited Zhanjiang Branch, CNOOC Limited, Zhanjiang 524051, China)
Abstract
Multi-stage fractured horizontal wells (MSFHWs) represent a crucial development approach for low-permeability reservoirs, where accurate productivity prediction is essential for production operations. However, existing models suffer from limitations such as inadequate characterization of complex flow mechanisms within the reservoir or computational complexity. This study subdivides the flow process into three segments: matrix, fracture, and wellbore. By employing discretization concepts, potential distribution theory, and the principle of potential superposition, a productivity prediction model tailored for MSFHWs in low-permeability reservoirs is established. Moreover, this model provides a clearer characterization of fluid seepage processes during horizontal well production, which aligns more closely with the actual production process. Validated against actual production data from an offshore oilfield and benchmarked against classical models, the proposed model demonstrates satisfactory accuracy and reliability. Sensitivity analysis reveals that a lower Threshold Pressure Gradient (TPG) corresponds to higher productivity; a production pressure differential of 10 MPa yields an average increase of 22.41 m 3 /d in overall daily oil production compared to 5 MPa, concurrently reducing the overall production decline rate by 26.59% on average. Larger stress-sensitive coefficients lead to reduced production, with the fracture stress-sensitive coefficient exerting a more significant influence; for an equivalent increment, the matrix stress-sensitive coefficient causes a production decrease of 1.92 m 3 /d (a 4.32% decline), while the fracture stress-sensitive coefficient results in a decrease of 4.87 m 3 /d (a 20.93% decline). Increased fracture half-length and number enhance production, with an initial productivity increase of 21.61% (gradually diminishing to 7.1%) for longer fracture half-lengths and 24.63% (gradually diminishing to 5.22%) for more fractures; optimal critical values exist for both parameters.
Suggested Citation
Long Xiao & Ping Yue & Hongnan Yang & Wei Guo & Simin Qu & Hui Yao & Lingqiang Meng, 2025.
"Coupled Productivity Prediction Model for Multi-Stage Fractured Horizontal Wells in Low-Permeability Reservoirs Considering Threshold Pressure Gradient and Stress Sensitivity,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-20, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3654-:d:1699050
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3654-:d:1699050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.