Author
Listed:
- Yulong Xie
(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA)
- Matthew Tyler
(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA)
- Jennifer Huckett
(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA)
- Rosemarie Bartlett
(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA)
- Yan Chen
(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA)
- Victor Salcido
(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA)
- Vrushali Mendon
(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA)
- Michael Rosenberg
(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA)
Abstract
Building energy codes are essential tools for achieving energy efficiency in buildings. However, the full energy savings potential of these codes can only be realized if buildings are constructed in compliance with them. Therefore, evaluating building energy code compliance is crucial in bridging the gap between the energy efficiency requirements set by energy codes and the actualized energy savings achieved. An energy code compliance evaluation serves as a mechanism to assess construction practices, evaluate the effectiveness of code enforcement, identify gaps in compliance, and guide strategies for improvement through training and education. Conducting code compliance evaluation activities involves field studies that require careful design and significant resources. Historically, more emphasis has been placed on developing and adopting building energy codes, while efforts to evaluate compliance have been relatively limited and lacking consistent approaches. The passage of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), which mandated that states create plans for achieving 90% compliance within eight years, stimulated the need for an energy code compliance evaluation. As a result, federal, state, and local governments, and utilities have invested in the development of methodologies and tools for code compliance evaluation studies. This paper reviews the code compliance evaluation studies conducted in the United States over the past three decades. It describes and compares the methodologies and metrics used to assess building energy code compliance, summarizes the general elements and steps involved in the evaluation process, and discusses common issues in these studies. Over time, code compliance evaluation methodologies have evolved from isolated development within individual states, regions, and utilities, to widely accepted protocols applicable across different states and local jurisdictions. There has been a transition in compliance metrics, shifting from historical compliance rates to energy-consumption-oriented approaches.
Suggested Citation
Yulong Xie & Matthew Tyler & Jennifer Huckett & Rosemarie Bartlett & Yan Chen & Victor Salcido & Vrushali Mendon & Michael Rosenberg, 2023.
"A Review of the Evaluation of Building Energy Code Compliance in the United States,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-38, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:16:p:5874-:d:1213044
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Pan, Wei & Garmston, Helen, 2012.
"Compliance with building energy regulations for new-build dwellings,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 11-22.
- Aydin, Erdal & Brounen, Dirk, 2019.
"The impact of policy on residential energy consumption,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 115-129.
- Aydin, Erdal, 2024.
"Heterogeneous impacts of building codes on residential energy demand,"
Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:16:p:5874-:d:1213044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.