IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i12p4690-d1170364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of the CFD Tools against In-House Experiments for Predicting Condensing Steam Flows in Nozzles

Author

Listed:
  • Sima Shabani

    (Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Mirosław Majkut

    (Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Sławomir Dykas

    (Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Krystian Smołka

    (Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Esmail Lakzian

    (Center of Computational Energy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar 9617976487, Iran
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Andong National University, Andong 36729, Republic of Korea)

  • Guojie Zhang

    (School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

Abstract

The issues addressed in this work concern the condensing steam flows as a flow of a two-phase medium, i.e., consisting of a gaseous phase and a dispersed phase in the form of liquid droplets. The two-phase character and the necessity to treat steam as a real gas make the numerical modeling of the flow in the last steam turbine channels very difficult. There are many approaches known to solve this problem numerically, mainly based on the RANS method with the Eulerian approach. In this paper, the two Eulerian approaches were compared. In in-house CFD code, the flow governing equations were defined for a gas–liquid mixture, whereas in ANSYS CFX code, individual equations were defined for the gas and liquid phase (except momentum equations). In both codes, it was assumed that there was no velocity slip between phases. The main aim of this study was to show how the different numerical schemes and different governing equations can affect the modeling of wet steam flows and how difficult and sensitive this type of computation is. The numerical results of condensing steam flows were compared against in-house experimental data for nozzles determined at the Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery of the Silesian University of Technology. The presented experimental data can be used as a benchmark test for researchers to model wet steam flows. The geometries of two half nozzles and an International Wet Steam Experimental Project (IWSEP) nozzle were used for the comparisons. The static pressure measurements on the walls of the nozzles, the Schlieren technique, and the droplet size measurement were used to qualitatively identify the location of the condensation onset and its intensity. The CFD results obtained by means of both codes showed their good capabilities in terms of proper prediction of the condensation process; however, there were some visible differences in both codes in the flow field parameters. In ANSYS CFX, the condensation wave location in the half nozzles occurred much earlier compared to the experiments. However, the in-house code showed good agreement with the experiments in this region. In addition, the results of the in-house code for the mean droplet diameter in the IWSEP nozzle were closer to the experimental data.

Suggested Citation

  • Sima Shabani & Mirosław Majkut & Sławomir Dykas & Krystian Smołka & Esmail Lakzian & Guojie Zhang, 2023. "Validation of the CFD Tools against In-House Experiments for Predicting Condensing Steam Flows in Nozzles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:12:p:4690-:d:1170364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4690/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4690/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Halama, Jan & Benkhaldoun, Fayssal & Fořt, Jaroslav, 2010. "Numerical modeling of two-phase transonic flow," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 80(8), pages 1624-1635.
    2. Yamamoto, Satoru, 2005. "Computation of practical flow problems with release of latent heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 197-208.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yamamoto, Satoru & Uemura, Akihiro & Miyazawa, Hironori & Furusawa, Takashi & Yonezawa, Koichi & Umezawa, Shuichi & Ohmori, Shuichi & Suzuki, Takeshi, 2020. "A numerical and analytical coupling method for predicting the performance of intermediate-pressure steam turbines in operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Piotr Wiśniewski & Guojie Zhang & Sławomir Dykas, 2022. "Numerical Investigation of the Influence of Air Contaminants on the Interfacial Heat Transfer in Transonic Flow in a Compressor Rotor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:12:p:4690-:d:1170364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.