IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i18p6617-d911534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety Analysis and Evaluation of Hydrogen Cylinder Periodic Inspection Station

Author

Listed:
  • Geng Zhang

    (Institute of Safety & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Jin Guo

    (Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
    Guangdong Institute of Special Equipment Inspection and Research, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Yue Tan

    (Guangdong Institute of Special Equipment Inspection and Research, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Guohua Chen

    (Institute of Safety & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Chilou Zhou

    (Institute of Safety & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Wei Li

    (Guangdong Institute of Special Equipment Inspection and Research, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Li Xia

    (Guangdong Institute of Special Equipment Inspection and Research, Guangzhou 510640, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of the hydrogen energy industry, the number of hydrogen cylinders has reached a very large scale. At present, both domestic and international experiences of hydrogen cylinder inspection are zero, which makes the inspection work more challenging and unpredictable. In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the responsibility of safety in production, but the research on the risk and safety of cylinder inspection institutions is very limited. In this paper, the Job safety analysis (JSA) method is used to carry out systematic risk identification, risk assessment, risk prevention, and other research work of the cylinder inspection station. After the JSA method and experience accumulation, the management strategy is continuously perfecting, and the security risk level is absolutely decreasing.

Suggested Citation

  • Geng Zhang & Jin Guo & Yue Tan & Guohua Chen & Chilou Zhou & Wei Li & Li Xia, 2022. "Safety Analysis and Evaluation of Hydrogen Cylinder Periodic Inspection Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-9, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6617-:d:911534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6617/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6617/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Quanlong & Peng, Yumeng & Li, Zhiyang & Zhao, Pan & Qiu, Zunxiang, 2021. "Hazard identification methodology for underground coal mine risk management - Root-State Hazard Identification," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Wang & Qiang Wei & Guotang Zhao & Jingchun Wang & Yang Yin, 2022. "Safety Risk Identification Method for Railway Construction in Complex and Dangerous Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Xiong, Yachao & Qi, Hui & Li, Zequan & Zhang, Qiuhan, 2023. "Where risk, where capability? Building the emergency management capability structure of coal mining enterprises based on risk matching perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Jiskani, Izhar Mithal & Yasli, Fatma & Hosseini, Shahab & Rehman, Atta Ur & Uddin, Salah, 2022. "Improved Z-number based fuzzy fault tree approach to analyze health and safety risks in surface mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6617-:d:911534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.