IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2021i1p131-d710922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harvesting Technologies and Costs of Biomass Production from Energy Crops Cultivated on Farms in the Małopolska Region

Author

Listed:
  • Dariusz Kwaśniewski

    (Department of Production Engineering, Logistics and Applied Computer Science, Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 30-149 Krakow, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Płonka

    (Department of Economics and Food Economy, Faculty of Agriculture and Economics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Paweł Mickiewicz

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, West Pomeranian University of Technology Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

This study aimed to assess biomass production costs from perennial energy crops, such as Miscanthus giganteus , Sida hermaphrodita , and coppiced willow, in selected agricultural holdings. This assessment was based on applied technologies for harvesting the biomass of the energy crops mentioned above. The scope of the study included research on ten farms located in Małopolska and establishing the possibility of biomass production from selected energy crops in these entities. Biomass production costs have been estimated using the computer application “Bioalkylation”. The result of the research was the answer to the question: what can be the cost range of biomass production from perennial energy crops for the crops Miscanthus giganteus , Sida hermaphrodita , and coppiced willow as the most popular plants? The study shows that production costs depend primarily on the harvesting technology used and the machinery used in the farm. The harvest with rotary mowers, small presses, and windrows was applied regarding Miscanthus giganteus and Sida hermaphrodita . The costs of biomass production were, on average, 424.7 EUR ha −1 for Miscanthus giganteus and 278.9 EUR ha −1 for Sida hermaphrodita . Concerning tonne, this was 37.6 EUR t −1 for Miscanthus giganteus and 30.0 EUR t −1 for Sida hermaphrodita , respectively. In the case of harvesting energy willow, in the form of whole shoots, inefficient and labour-intensive technologies using chainsaws and combustion cutters were applied. The biomass production costs were thus the highest among the assessed plants and amounted, on average, to 612.1 EUR ha −1 , which in terms of tonne corresponded to a value of 30.6 EUR. The obtained results and the analysis presented in the paper may help in planning the cultivation of perennial energy crops in order to obtain biomass used for heating purposes on a farm.

Suggested Citation

  • Dariusz Kwaśniewski & Aleksandra Płonka & Paweł Mickiewicz, 2021. "Harvesting Technologies and Costs of Biomass Production from Energy Crops Cultivated on Farms in the Małopolska Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:131-:d:710922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/131/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/131/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renata Marks-Bielska & Stanisław Bielski & Katarzyna Pik & Krystyna Kurowska, 2020. "The Importance of Renewable Energy Sources in Poland’s Energy Mix," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Mariusz Dacko & Aleksandra Płonka & Łukasz Satoła & Aneta Dacko, 2021. "Sustainable Development According to the Opinions of Polish Experts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Murat Danisman & Erkut Akkartal, 2023. "Defining a New Business Model for Sustainable Biomass Production from Forestry Residues in T rkiye by Using TRIZ," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 243-253, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Duczkowska & Ewa Kulińska & Zbigniew Plutecki & Joanna Rut, 2022. "Sustainable Agro-Biomass Market for Urban Heating Using Centralized District Heating System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Jakub Jan Zięty & Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzykowski & Michał Krzyżaniak, 2022. "Legal Framework for the Sustainable Production of Short Rotation Coppice Biomass for Bioeconomy and Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz & Magdalena Zioło & Marek Dylewski, 2021. "Dynamic Analysis of the Similarity of Objects in Research on the Use of Renewable Energy Resources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Paweł Dudziec & Michał Krzyżaniak & Ewelina Olba-Zięty, 2021. "Solid Biomass Energy Potential as a Development Opportunity for Rural Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Krystyna Kurowska & Hubert Kryszk & Stanisław Bielski, 2022. "Location and Technical Requirements for Photovoltaic Power Stations in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Elżbieta Jadwiga Szymańska & Maria Kubacka & Joanna Woźniak & Jan Polaszczyk, 2022. "Analysis of Residential Buildings in Poland for Potential Energy Renovation toward Zero-Emission Construction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Aleksandra Płonka & Mariusz Dacko & Łukasz Satoła & Aneta Dacko, 2022. "The Idea of Sustainable Development and the Possibilities of Its Interpretation and Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Mussawir Ul Mehmood & Abasin Ulasyar & Waleed Ali & Kamran Zeb & Haris Sheh Zad & Waqar Uddin & Hee-Je Kim, 2023. "A New Cloud-Based IoT Solution for Soiling Ratio Measurement of PV Systems Using Artificial Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Zbigniew Brodziński & Katarzyna Brodzińska & Mikołaj Szadziun, 2021. "Photovoltaic Farms—Economic Efficiency of Investments in North-East Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Wiktor Hebda, 2021. "The North-South Gas Corridor in the Context of Poland’s Gas Transmission System—A Perfect Opportunity to Diversify Gas Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Grzegorz Ślusarz & Barbara Gołębiewska & Marek Cierpiał-Wolan & Dariusz Twaróg & Jarosław Gołębiewski & Sebastian Wójcik, 2021. "The Role of Agriculture and Rural Areas in the Development of Autonomous Energy Regions in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Haller Alina-Petronela & Hârşan Georgia-Daniela Tacu, 2021. "Causes of Sustainable Tourism Resilience in Central and Eastern Europe. The Case of Three Countries: Romania, Bulgaria and Poland," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1251-1268, December.
    13. Beata Zatwarnicka-Madura & Robert Nowacki & Iwona Wojciechowska, 2022. "Influencer Marketing as a Tool in Modern Communication—Possibilities of Use in Green Energy Promotion amongst Poland’s Generation Z," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Sylwester Robak & Robert Raczkowski & Michał Piekarz, 2023. "Development of the Wind Generation Sector and Its Effect on the Grid Operation—The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Katarzyna Kosowska & Piotr Kosowski, 2022. "Energy Security of Hydropower Producing Countries—The Cases of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    16. Marcin Połom, 2021. "Technology Development and Spatial Diffusion of Auxiliary Power Sources in Trolleybuses in European Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Paweł Kut & Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik & Barbara Tchórzewska-Cieślak, 2021. "Reliability-Oriented Design of a Solar-PV Deployments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Joanna Rakowska & Mariusz Maciejczak & Iwona M. Batyk & Eliza Farelnik, 2022. "Rural–Urban Differences in Solar Renewable Energy Investments Supported by Public Finance in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Daniel Prusak & Grzegorz Karpiel & Konrad Kułakowski, 2021. "The Architecture of a Real-Time Control System for Heating Energy Management in the Intelligent Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    20. Ioannidis, Filippos & Kosmidou, Kyriaki & Papanastasiou, Dimitra, 2023. "Public awareness of renewable energy sources and Circular Economy in Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1086-1096.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:131-:d:710922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.