IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i9p2600-d547851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probabilistic Flood Assessment Methodology for Nuclear Power Plants Considering Extreme Rainfall

Author

Listed:
  • Beom-Jin Kim

    (Smart Structural Safety and Prognosis Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea)

  • Minkyu Kim

    (Smart Structural Safety and Prognosis Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea)

  • Daegi Hahm

    (Smart Structural Safety and Prognosis Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea)

  • Junhee Park

    (Smart Structural Safety and Prognosis Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea)

  • Kun-Yeun Han

    (School of Architectural, Civil, Environmental and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea)

Abstract

Abnormal weather conditions due to climate change are currently increasing on both global and local scales. It is therefore important to ensure the safety of the areas where major national facilities are located by analyzing risk quantitatively and re-evaluating the existing major facilities, such as nuclear power plants, considering the load and capacity of extreme flood conditions. In this study, a risk analysis method is developed that combines flood hazard curves with fragility curves using hydraulic and hydrological models by GIS tools and the @RISK model for the probabilistic flood analysis of nuclear power plant sites. A two-dimensional (2D) analysis is first carried out to estimate flood depths in various watershed scenarios, and a representative hazard curve for both external and internal flooding is made by applying a verified probability distribution type for the flood watersheds. For the analysis of flooding within buildings, an internal grid is constructed using GIS with related design drawings, and based on the flood depth results of the 2D analysis, a hazard curve for the representative internal inundation using a verified probability distribution type is presented. In the present study, walkdowns with nuclear experts are conducted around the nuclear power plant area to evaluate the fragile structures and facilities under possible flooding. After reviewing the 2D inundation analysis results based on the selected major equipment and facilities, the zones requiring risk assessment are re-assigned. A fragility curve applying probability distribution for the site’s major equipment and facilities is also presented. Failure risk analysis of the major facilities is then conducted by combining the proposed hazard and fragility curves. Results in the form of quantitative values are obtained, and the indicators for risks as well as the reliability and optimal measures to support decision-making are also presented. Through this study, it is confirmed that risk assessment based on the proposed probabilistic flood analysis technique is possible for flood events occurring at nuclear power plant sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Beom-Jin Kim & Minkyu Kim & Daegi Hahm & Junhee Park & Kun-Yeun Han, 2021. "Probabilistic Flood Assessment Methodology for Nuclear Power Plants Considering Extreme Rainfall," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2600-:d:547851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2600/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2600/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. Winter & K. Schneeberger & M. Huttenlau & J. Stötter, 2018. "Sources of uncertainty in a probabilistic flood risk model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(2), pages 431-446, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Chong & Ju, Ping & Wu, Feng & Pan, Xueping & Wang, Zhaoyu, 2022. "A systematic review on power system resilience from the perspective of generation, network, and load," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindsay Beevers & Lila Collet & Gordon Aitken & Claire Maravat & Annie Visser, 2020. "The influence of climate model uncertainty on fluvial flood hazard estimation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(3), pages 2489-2510, December.
    2. Juan Pinos & Daniel Orellana & Luis Timbe, 2020. "Assessment of microscale economic flood losses in urban and agricultural areas: case study of the Santa Bárbara River, Ecuador," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(2), pages 2323-2337, September.
    3. Hadush Meresa & Yongqiang Zhang, 2021. "Contrasting Uncertainties in Estimating Floods and Low Flow Extremes," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(6), pages 1775-1795, April.
    4. Kui Xu & Chenyue Wang & Lingling Bin, 2023. "Compound flood models in coastal areas: a review of methods and uncertainty analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 469-496, March.
    5. Tugkan Tanir & Andre de Souza de Lima & Gustavo A. Coelho & Sukru Uzun & Felicio Cassalho & Celso M. Ferreira, 2021. "Assessing the spatiotemporal socioeconomic flood vulnerability of agricultural communities in the Potomac River Watershed," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 225-251, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2600-:d:547851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.