IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i15p4641-d605712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Closed-Form Expressions to Estimate the Mean and Variance of the Total Vector Error

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Mingotti

    (Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering “Guglielmo Marconi”, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Federica Costa

    (Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering “Guglielmo Marconi”, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Lorenzo Peretto

    (Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering “Guglielmo Marconi”, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Roberto Tinarelli

    (Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering “Guglielmo Marconi”, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

The need for accurate measurements and for estimating the uncertainties associated with measures are two pillars for researchers and metrologists. This is particularly true in distribution networks due to a mass deployment of new intelligent electronic devices. Among such devices, phasor measurement units are key enablers for obtaining the full observability of the grid. The phasor measurement unit performance is mostly evaluated by means of the total vector error, which combines the error on amplitude, phase, and time. However, the total vector error is typically provided merely as a number, that could vary within an unknown interval. This may result into the phasor measurement unit incompliance with the final user expectancies. To this purpose, and with the aim of answering practical needs from the industrial world, this paper presents a closed-form expression that allows us to quantify, in a simple way, the confidence interval associated with the total vector error. The input required by the expression is the set of errors that typically affects the analog to digital converter of a phasor measurement unit. The obtained expression has been validated by means of the Monte Carlo method in a variety of realistic conditions. The results confirm the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed expression. It can be then easily implemented in all monitoring device algorithms, or directly by the manufacturer to characterize their devices, to solve the lack of knowledge that affects the total vector error computation.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Mingotti & Federica Costa & Lorenzo Peretto & Roberto Tinarelli, 2021. "Closed-Form Expressions to Estimate the Mean and Variance of the Total Vector Error," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4641-:d:605712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mojgan Hojabri & Ulrich Dersch & Antonios Papaemmanouil & Peter Bosshart, 2019. "A Comprehensive Survey on Phasor Measurement Unit Applications in Distribution Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Granados-Lieberman, 2020. "Global Harmonic Parameters for Estimation of Power Quality Indices: An Approach for PMUs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Jing Zhang & Yiqi Li & Zhi Wu & Chunyan Rong & Tao Wang & Zhang Zhang & Suyang Zhou, 2021. "Deep-Reinforcement-Learning-Based Two-Timescale Voltage Control for Distribution Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Do-In Kim, 2021. "Complementary Feature Extractions for Event Identification in Power Systems Using Multi-Channel Convolutional Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Karthikeyan Subramanian & Ashok Kumar Loganathan, 2020. "Islanding Detection Using a Micro-Synchrophasor for Distribution Systems with Distributed Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-31, October.
    5. Khaoula Hassini & Ahmed Fakhfakh & Faouzi Derbel, 2023. "Optimal Placement of μ PMUs in Distribution Networks with Adaptive Topology Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Mussawir Ul Mehmood & Abasin Ulasyar & Abraiz Khattak & Kashif Imran & Haris Sheh Zad & Shibli Nisar, 2020. "Cloud Based IoT Solution for Fault Detection and Localization in Power Distribution Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Zunaib Ali & Komal Saleem & Robert Brown & Nicholas Christofides & Sandra Dudley, 2022. "Performance Analysis and Benchmarking of PLL-Driven Phasor Measurement Units for Renewable Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Chinmayee Biswal & Binod Kumar Sahu & Manohar Mishra & Pravat Kumar Rout, 2023. "Real-Time Grid Monitoring and Protection: A Comprehensive Survey on the Advantages of Phasor Measurement Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-34, May.
    9. Nikolaos-Antonios I. Livanos & Sami Hammal & Nikolaos Giamarelos & Vagelis Alifragkis & Constantinos S. Psomopoulos & Elias N. Zois, 2023. "OpenEdgePMU: An Open PMU Architecture with Edge Processing for Future Resilient Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-29, March.
    10. Muhammad Musadiq Ahmed & Muhammad Amjad & Muhammad Ali Qureshi & Kashif Imran & Zunaib Maqsood Haider & Muhammad Omer Khan, 2022. "A Critical Review of State-of-the-Art Optimal PMU Placement Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Giovanni Artale & Giuseppe Caravello & Antonio Cataliotti & Valentina Cosentino & Dario Di Cara & Salvatore Guaiana & Ninh Nguyen Quang & Marco Palmeri & Nicola Panzavecchia & Giovanni Tinè, 2020. "A Virtual Tool for Load Flow Analysis in a Micro-Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    12. Phylicia Cicilio & David Glennon & Adam Mate & Arthur Barnes & Vishvas Chalishazar & Eduardo Cotilla-Sanchez & Bjorn Vaagensmith & Jake Gentle & Craig Rieger & Richard Wies & Mohammad Heidari Kapourch, 2021. "Resilience in an Evolving Electrical Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4641-:d:605712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.