IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i6p1338-d332191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of NMR T 2 Cutoff and CT Scanning for Pore Structure Evaluation in Mixed Siliciclastic–Carbonate Rocks before and after Acidification

Author

Listed:
  • Mengqi Wang

    (College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Jun Xie

    (College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Fajun Guo

    (Exploration and Development Research Institute of Huabei Oilfield Company, CNPC, Hebei 062552, China)

  • Yawei Zhou

    (College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Xudong Yang

    (College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Ziang Meng

    (College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is used widely to characterize petrophysical properties of siliciclastic and carbonate rocks but rarely to study those of mixed siliciclastic–carbonate rocks. In this study, 13 different core samples and eight acidified core samples selected amongst those 13 from the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Southern Laizhouwan Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, were tested by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), micro-nano-computed tomography (CT), and NMR. SEM and CT results revealed a complex pore structure diversity, pore distribution, and pore-throat connectivity in mixed reservoirs. Sixteen groups of NMR experiments addressed changes in these properties and permeabilities of mixed siliciclastic–carbonate rocks before and after acidification to determine its effects on such reservoirs. NMR experimental results showed no “diffusion coupling” effect in mixed siliciclastic–carbonate rocks. Distributions of NMR T 2 cutoff values ( T 2 C ) are closely related to the pore structure and lithologic characteristics before and after acidification. The T 2 C index separates irreducible and movable fluids in porous rocks and is a key factor in permeability prediction. Centrifugation experiments showed that, before acidification, the T 2 C of mixed siliciclastic–carbonate rocks with 60–90% siliciclastic content (MSR) ranged widely from 1.5 to 9.8 ms; the T 2 C of mixed siliciclastic–carbonate rocks with 60–90% carbonate content (MCR) ranged from 1.8 to 5.6 ms. After acidification, the T 2 C of MSR ranged widely from 2.6 to 11.6 ms, the T 2 C of MCR ranged from 1.5 to 5.6 ms, and no significant difference was observed between MCR reservoirs. Based on an analysis of the morphology of NMR T 2 spectra, we propose a new T 2 cutoff value prediction method for mixed siliciclastic–carbonate rocks based on a normal distribution function to predict various T 2 C values from morphological differences in NMR T 2 spectra and to calculate the irreducible water saturation ( S wir ), i.e., the ratio of irreducible total fluid volume to effective porosity. The reliability of the proposed method is verified by comparing predicted T 2 C and S wir values with those from NMR experimental results. New experiments and modeling demonstrate the applicability of NMR for the petrophysical characterization of mixed siliciclastic–carbonate rock reservoirs. Our results have potential applications for identification and evaluation of mixed siliciclastic–carbonate rock reservoirs using NMR logging.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengqi Wang & Jun Xie & Fajun Guo & Yawei Zhou & Xudong Yang & Ziang Meng, 2020. "Determination of NMR T 2 Cutoff and CT Scanning for Pore Structure Evaluation in Mixed Siliciclastic–Carbonate Rocks before and after Acidification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1338-:d:332191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinkai Wang & Hengyi Liu & Jinliang Zhang & Jun Xie, 2018. "Lost Gas Mechanism and Quantitative Characterization during Injection and Production of Water-Flooded Sandstone Underground Gas Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-26, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianmeng Sun & Ping Feng & Peng Chi & Weichao Yan, 2022. "Microscopic Conductivity Mechanism and Saturation Evaluation of Tight Sandstone Reservoirs: A Case Study from Bonan Oilfield, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    2. Weichao Yan & Fujing Sun & Jianmeng Sun & Naser Golsanami, 2021. "Distribution Model of Fluid Components and Quantitative Calculation of Movable Oil in Inter-Salt Shale Using 2D NMR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jinkai & Feng, Xiaoyong & Wanyan, Qiqi & Zhao, Kai & Wang, Ziji & Pei, Gen & Xie, Jun & Tian, Bo, 2022. "Hysteresis effect of three-phase fluids in the high-intensity injection–production process of sandstone underground gas storages," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    2. Wang, Jieming & Wang, Jinkai & Xu, Shujuan & Wu, Rui & Lv, Jian & Li, Zhi & Li, Chun & Zhang, Jinliang & Zhao, Lei & Xie, Jun & Zhang, Jianguo, 2022. "A novel mode for “three zones” collaborative reconstruction of underground gas storage and its application to large, low-permeability lithologic gas reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    3. Lun Zhao & Jincai Wang & Libing Fu & Li Chen & Zhihao Jia, 2023. "Improve Oil Recovery Mechanism of Multi-Layer Cyclic Alternate Injection and Production for Mature Oilfield at Extra-High Water Cut Stage Using Visual Physical Simulation Experiment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1338-:d:332191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.