IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i18p4862-d414903.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning-Based Probabilistic Lithofacies Prediction from Conventional Well Logs: A Case from the Umiat Oil Field of Alaska

Author

Listed:
  • Nilesh Dixit

    (Physics, Geology and Engineering Technology Department, Northern Kentucky University, Nunn Drive, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA)

  • Paul McColgan

    (McColgan Seismic Interpretation Services, 7355 Huckleberry Lane, Montgomery, OH 45242, USA)

  • Kimberly Kusler

    (Physics, Geology and Engineering Technology Department, Northern Kentucky University, Nunn Drive, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA)

Abstract

A good understanding of different rock types and their distribution is critical to locate oil and gas accumulations in the subsurface. Traditionally, rock core samples are used to directly determine the exact rock facies and what geological environments might be present. Core samples are often expensive to recover and, therefore, not always available for each well. Wireline logs provide a cheaper alternative to core samples, but they do not distinguish between various rock facies alone. This problem can be overcome by integrating limited core data with largely available wireline log data with machine learning. Here, we presented an application of machine learning in rock facies predictions based on limited core data from the Umiat Oil Field of Alaska. First, we identified five sandstone reservoir facies within the Lower Grandstand Member using core samples and mineralogical data available for the Umiat 18 well. Next, we applied machine learning algorithms (ascendant hierarchical clustering, self-organizing maps, artificial neural network, and multi-resolution graph-based clustering) to available wireline log data to build our models trained with core-driven information. We found that self-organizing maps provided the best result among other techniques for facies predictions. We used the best self-organizing maps scheme for predicting similar reservoir facies in nearby uncored wells—Umiat 23H and SeaBee-1. We validated our facies prediction results for these wells with observed seismic data.

Suggested Citation

  • Nilesh Dixit & Paul McColgan & Kimberly Kusler, 2020. "Machine Learning-Based Probabilistic Lithofacies Prediction from Conventional Well Logs: A Case from the Umiat Oil Field of Alaska," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4862-:d:414903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4862/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4862/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ha Quang Man & Doan Huy Hien & Kieu Duy Thong & Bui Viet Dung & Nguyen Minh Hoa & Truong Khac Hoa & Nguyen Van Kieu & Pham Quy Ngoc, 2021. "Hydraulic Flow Unit Classification and Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Case Study from the Nam Con Son Basin, Offshore Vietnam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Tihana Ružić & Marko Cvetković, 2021. "Geological Characterization of the 3D Seismic Record within the Gas Bearing Upper Miocene Sediments in the Northern Part of the Bjelovar Subdepression—Application of Amplitude Versus Offset Analysis a," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Reza Rezaee, 2022. "Editorial on Special Issues of Development of Unconventional Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-9, April.
    4. Hai Wang & Shengnan Chen, 2023. "Insights into the Application of Machine Learning in Reservoir Engineering: Current Developments and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-11, January.
    5. Jiyuan Zhang & Qihong Feng & Xianmin Zhang & Qiujia Hu & Jiaosheng Yang & Ning Wang, 2020. "A Novel Data-Driven Method to Estimate Methane Adsorption Isotherm on Coals Using the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree: A Case Study in the Qinshui Basin, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4862-:d:414903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.