IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i6p1051-d215144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Regulator Supply Restoration Time

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Ikhwan Muhammad Ridzuan

    (Faculty of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pekan 26600, Malaysia)

  • Sasa Z. Djokic

    (Institute for Energy System, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, UK)

Abstract

In conventional reliability analysis, the duration of interruptions relied on the input parameter of mean time to repair (MTTR) values in the network components. For certain criteria without network automation, reconfiguration functionalities and/or energy regulator requirements to protect customers from long excessive duration of interruptions, the use of MTTR input seems reasonable. Since modern distribution networks are shifting towards smart grid, some factors must be considered in the reliability assessment process. For networks that apply reconfiguration functionalities and/or network automation, the duration of interruptions experienced by a customer due to faulty network components should be addressed with an automation switch or manual action time that does not exceed the regulator supply restoration time. Hence, this paper introduces a comprehensive methodology of substituting MTTR with maximum action time required to replace/repair a network component and to restore customer duration of interruption with maximum network reconfiguration time based on energy regulator supply requirements. The Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) technique was applied to medium voltage (MV) suburban networks to estimate system-related reliability indices. In this analysis, the purposed method substitutes all MTTR values with time to supply (TTS), which correspond with the UK Guaranteed Standard of Performance (GSP-UK), by the condition of the MTTR value being higher than TTS value. It is nearly impossible for all components to have a quick repairing time, only components on the main feeder were selected for time substitution. Various scenarios were analysed, and the outcomes reflected the applicability of reconfiguration and the replace/repair time of network component. Theoretically, the network reconfiguration (option 1) and component replacement (option 2) with the same amount of repair time should produce exactly the same outputs. However, in simulation, these two options yield different outputs in terms of number and duration of interruptions. Each scenario has its advantages and disadvantages, in which the distribution network operators (DNOs) were selected based on their operating conditions and requirements. The regulator reliability-based network operation is more applicable than power loss-based network operation in counties that employed energy regulator requirements (e.g., GSP-UK) or areas with many factories that required a reliable continuous supply.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Ikhwan Muhammad Ridzuan & Sasa Z. Djokic, 2019. "Energy Regulator Supply Restoration Time," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:6:p:1051-:d:215144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/6/1051/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/6/1051/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ke-yan Liu & Wanxing Sheng & Yongmei Liu & Xiaoli Meng, 2017. "A Network Reconfiguration Method Considering Data Uncertainties in Smart Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Firas M. F. Flaih & Xiangning Lin & Mohammed Kdair Abd & Samir M. Dawoud & Zhengtian Li & Owolabi Sunday Adio, 2017. "A New Method for Distribution Network Reconfiguration Analysis under Different Load Demands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Juan Wen & Yanghong Tan & Lin Jiang, 2016. "A Reconfiguration Strategy of Distribution Networks Considering Node Importance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Fábio Usberti & Christiano Lyra & Celso Cavellucci & José González, 2015. "Hierarchical multiple criteria optimization of maintenance activities on power distribution networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 224(1), pages 171-192, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bordin, Chiara & Mishra, Sambeet & Palu, Ivo, 2021. "A multihorizon approach for the reliability oriented network restructuring problem, considering learning effects, construction time, and cables maintenance costs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 878-895.
    2. Marcin Szott & Szymon Wermiński & Marcin Jarnut & Jacek Kaniewski & Grzegorz Benysek, 2021. "Battery Energy Storage System for Emergency Supply and Improved Reliability of Power Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rade Čađenović & Damir Jakus & Petar Sarajčev & Josip Vasilj, 2018. "Optimal Distribution Network Reconfiguration through Integration of Cycle-Break and Genetic Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Pengwei Cong & Wei Tang & Lu Zhang & Bo Zhang & Yongxiang Cai, 2017. "Day-Ahead Active Power Scheduling in Active Distribution Network Considering Renewable Energy Generation Forecast Errors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Mirna Fouad Abd El-salam & Eman Beshr & Magdy B. Eteiba, 2018. "A New Hybrid Technique for Minimizing Power Losses in a Distribution System by Optimal Sizing and Siting of Distributed Generators with Network Reconfiguration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Klyapovskiy, Sergey & You, Shi & Michiorri, Andrea & Kariniotakis, George & Bindner, Henrik W., 2019. "Incorporating flexibility options into distribution grid reinforcement planning: A techno-economic framework approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    5. Zhijian Qu & Hanxin Liu & Hanlin Wang & Xinqiang Chen & Rui Chi & Zixiao Wang, 2020. "Cluster equilibrium scheduling method based on backpressure flow control in railway power supply systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Mahesh Kumar & Perumal Nallagownden & Irraivan Elamvazuthi, 2017. "Optimal Placement and Sizing of Renewable Distributed Generations and Capacitor Banks into Radial Distribution Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Mateus Martin & Fabio Luiz Usberti & Christiano Lyra, 2024. "Improving reliability with optimal allocation of maintenance resources: an application to power distribution networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 345-365, September.
    8. Prashant & Anwar Shahzad Siddiqui & Md Sarwar & Ahmed Althobaiti & Sherif S. M. Ghoneim, 2022. "Optimal Location and Sizing of Distributed Generators in Power System Network with Power Quality Enhancement Using Fuzzy Logic Controlled D-STATCOM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-31, March.
    9. Jing Li & Guodong Wang & Haofei Zhou & Honggen Chen, 2023. "Redundancy allocation optimization for multi-state system with hierarchical performance requirements," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(6), pages 1031-1047, December.
    10. Wang, Fei & Zheng, Xia-zhong & Li, Nan & Shen, Xuesong, 2019. "Systemic vulnerability assessment of urban water distribution networks considering failure scenario uncertainty," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    11. Hun-Chul Seo, 2017. "New Adaptive Reclosing Technique in Unbalanced Distribution System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:6:p:1051-:d:215144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.