IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i2p214-d196592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sequential Model Predictive Control of Three-Phase Direct Matrix Converter

Author

Listed:
  • Jianwei Zhang

    (Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway NSW 2007, Sydney, Australia
    College of Electric Power, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010000, China)

  • Margarita Norambuena

    (Departamento de Ing. Electrica, Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Valparaiso 2390123, Chile)

  • Li Li

    (Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway NSW 2007, Sydney, Australia)

  • David Dorrell

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa)

  • Jose Rodriguez

    (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago 7500791, Chile)

Abstract

The matrix converter (MC) is a promising converter that performs the direct AC-to-AC conversion. Model predictive control (MPC) is a simple and powerful tool for power electronic converters, including the MC. However, weighting factor design and heavy computational burden impose significant challenges for this control strategy. This paper investigates the generalized sequential MPC (SMPC) for a three-phase direct MC. In this control strategy, each control objective has an individual cost function and these cost functions are evaluated sequentially based on priority. The complex weighting factor design process is not required. Compared with the standard MPC, the computation burden is reduced because only the pre-selected switch states are evaluated in the second and subsequent sequential cost functions. In addition, the prediction model computation for the following cost functions is also reduced. Specifying the priority for control objectives can be achieved. A comparative study with traditional MPC is carried out both in simulation and an experiment. Comparable control performance to the traditional MPC is achieved. This controller is suitable for the MC because of the reduced computational burden. Simulation and experimental results verify the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianwei Zhang & Margarita Norambuena & Li Li & David Dorrell & Jose Rodriguez, 2019. "Sequential Model Predictive Control of Three-Phase Direct Matrix Converter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:2:p:214-:d:196592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/214/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/214/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joaquim Monteiro & Sónia Pinto & Aranzazu Delgado Martin & José Fernando Silva, 2017. "A New Real Time Lyapunov Based Controller for Power Quality Improvement in Unified Power Flow Controllers Using Direct Matrix Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Shiyang Hu & Guorong Liu & Nan Jin & Leilei Guo, 2018. "Constant-Frequency Model Predictive Direct Power Control for Fault-Tolerant Bidirectional Voltage-Source Converter with Balanced Capacitor Voltage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergio Toledo & David Caballero & Edgar Maqueda & Juan J. Cáceres & Marco Rivera & Raúl Gregor & Patrick Wheeler, 2022. "Predictive Control Applied to Matrix Converters: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-30, October.
    2. Shuang Feng & Chaofan Wei & Jiaxing Lei, 2019. "Reduction of Prediction Errors for the Matrix Converter with an Improved Model Predictive Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Tomasz Sieńko & Jerzy Szczepanik & Claudia Martis, 2020. "Reactive Power Transfer via Matrix Converter Controlled by the “One Periodical” Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Pawel Szczesniak, 2019. "Challenges and Design Requirements for Industrial Applications of AC/AC Power Converters without DC-Link," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Duberney Murillo-Yarce & Baldomero Araya & Carlos Restrepo & Marco Rivera & Patrick Wheeler, 2023. "Impact of Sequential Model Predictive Control on Induction Motor Performance: Comparison of Converter Topologies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Duran & Efrain Ibaceta & Matias Diaz & Felix Rojas & Roberto Cardenas & Hector Chavez, 2020. "Control of a Modular Multilevel Matrix Converter for Unified Power Flow Controller Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Hyeong-Jun Yoo & Thai-Thanh Nguyen & Hak-Man Kim, 2019. "MPC with Constant Switching Frequency for Inverter-Based Distributed Generations in Microgrid Using Gradient Descent," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Jinlian Liu & Zheng Xu & Liang Xiao, 2019. "Comprehensive Power Flow Analyses and Novel Feedforward Coordination Control Strategy for MMC-Based UPFC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Xi Wu & Zhengyu Zhou & Gang Liu & Wanchun Qi & Zhenjian Xie, 2017. "Preventive Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow Considering UPFC Control Modes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Asare Koduah & Francis Boafo Effah, 2022. "Fuzzy-Logic-Controlled Hybrid Active Filter for Matrix Converter Input Current Harmonics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Rui Qin & Chunhua Yang & Hongwei Tao & Tao Peng & Chao Yang & Zhiwen Chen, 2019. "A Power Loss Decrease Method Based on Finite Set Model Predictive Control for a Motor Emulator with Reduced Switch Count," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:2:p:214-:d:196592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.