IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdisab/v1y2021i1p4-57d506383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individualised Funding: A Realist Analysis to Identify the Causal Factors That Facilitate Positive Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Padraic Fleming

    (Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland
    Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Department of Psychology and Social Sciences Institute, Maynooth University, W23 F2H6 Maynooth, Ireland)

  • Sinead McGilloway

    (Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Department of Psychology and Social Sciences Institute, Maynooth University, W23 F2H6 Maynooth, Ireland)

  • Steve Thomas

    (Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

There is growing interest, internationally, in empowering people with disabilities, and the United Nations have identified individualised funding as one way in which empowerment might be achieved. ‘Individualised funding’ is an umbrella term for various publicly funded support structures that provide personalised and individualised support services for people with a disability. These aim to facilitate self-direction, empowerment, independence, and self-determination. The findings of a recent mixed-methods systematic review of studies undertaken during an approximate 25-year period suggest positive effects with respect to quality of life, client satisfaction, and safety, as well as very few adverse effects, although the evidence on cost-effectiveness was inconclusive. This paper involved a re-examination of the qualitative findings of that review by employing a realist framework to explore the interplay between key contexts and mechanisms, and how these facilitate or inhibit positive outcomes associated with individualised funding and its underlying programme theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Padraic Fleming & Sinead McGilloway & Steve Thomas, 2021. "Individualised Funding: A Realist Analysis to Identify the Causal Factors That Facilitate Positive Outcomes," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:4-57:d:506383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/1/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/1/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Padraic Fleming & Mairead Furlong & Sinead McGilloway & Fiona Keogh & Marian Hernon & Tim Stainton, 2016. "PROTOCOL: Personal Budgeting Interventions to Improve Health and Social Care Outcomes for People with a Disability: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 1-73.
    2. Fernández, José-Luis & Kendall, Jeremy & Davey, Vanessa & Knapp, Martin, 2007. "Direct payments in England: factors linked to variations in local provision," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 15915, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Waitzberg, Ruth & Schmidt, Andrea E. & Blümel, Miriam & Penneau, Anne & Farmakas, Antonis & Ljungvall, Åsa & Barbabella, Francesco & Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo & Marchildon, Gregory P. & Saunes, Ingr, 2020. "Mapping variability in allocation of Long-Term Care funds across payer agencies in OECD countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 491-500.
    2. Georgia van Toorn, 2021. "Neoliberalism’s friends, foes and fellow travellers: What can radical feminist and disability perspectives bring to the policy mobilities approach?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(4), pages 723-740, June.
    3. Ashrita Saran & Howard White & Hannah Kuper, 2020. "Evidence and gap map of studies assessing the effectiveness of interventions for people with disabilities in low‐and middle‐income countries," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), March.
    4. Juliette Malley & José‐Luis Fernández, 2010. "Measuring Quality In Social Care Services: Theory And Practice," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 81(4), pages 559-582, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:4-57:d:506383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.