IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v9y2018i2p35-d164532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family Oncology Caregivers and Relational Health Literacy

Author

Listed:
  • Joy V. Goldsmith

    (Department of Communication & Film, The University of Memphis, 235 Art & Communication Building, Memphis, TN 38152-3150, USA)

  • Sachiko Terui

    (Department of Communication & Film, The University of Memphis, 235 Art & Communication Building, Memphis, TN 38152-3150, USA)

Abstract

Nearly one-third of the U.S. population provides unpaid, informal caregiving to a loved one or friend. Caregiver health literacy involves a complex set of actions and decisions, all shaped by communication. Existing definitions depict health literacy as individuals’ skills in obtaining, understanding, communicating, and applying health information to successfully navigate the health management process. One of the major problems with existing definitions of health literacy is that it disproportionately places responsibilities of health literacy on patients and caregivers. In this conceptual piece, we define and introduce a new model of Relational Health Literacy (RHL) that emphasizes the communicative aspects of health literacy among all stakeholders (patients, caregivers, providers, systems, and communities) and how communication functions as a pathway or barrier in co-creating health care and health management processes. Future directions and recommendations for model development are described.

Suggested Citation

  • Joy V. Goldsmith & Sachiko Terui, 2018. "Family Oncology Caregivers and Relational Health Literacy," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:35-:d:164532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/9/2/35/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/9/2/35/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mead, E.L. & Doorenbos, A.Z. & Javid, S.H. & Haozous, E.A. & Alvord, L.A. & Flum, D.R. & Morris, A.M., 2013. "Shared decision-making for cancer care among racial and ethnic minorities: A systematic review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(12), pages 15-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karriem S. Watson & Katherine Y. Tossas & Yazmin San Miguel & Nicole Gastala & Liliana G. San Miguel & Scott Grumeretz & Vida Henderson & Robert Winn & Masahito Jimbo & Keith B. Naylor & Megan E. Greg, 2023. "Mi-CARE: Comparing Three Evidence-Based Interventions to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening among Ethnic Minorities within Three Different Clinical Contexts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Dana L. Alden & John Friend & Ping Yein Lee & Yew Kong Lee & Lyndal Trevena & Chirk Jenn Ng & Sorapop Kiatpongsan & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Miho Tanaka & Supanida Limpongsanurak, 2018. "Who Decides: Me or We? Family Involvement in Medical Decision Making in Eastern and Western Countries," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(1), pages 14-25, January.
    3. Hsin-Lung Chan & In-Fun Li & Ling-Chun Tseng & Yvonne Hsiung, 2020. "Exploring Behavioral Readiness and Program Strategies to Engage Older Community Residents in Advance Care Planning: A Pilot Mixed-Method Study in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Thomas, Elizabeth C. & Bass, Sarah Bauerle & Siminoff, Laura A., 2021. "Beyond rationality: Expanding the practice of shared decision making in modern medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:35-:d:164532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.