IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v9y2019i1p13-d195611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modified Over-the-Row Machine Harvesters to Improve Northern Highbush Blueberry Fresh Fruit Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Wasko DeVetter

    (Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center, Department of Horticulture, Washington State University, 16650 State Route 536, Mount Vernon, WA 98273, USA)

  • Wei Qiang Yang

    (North Willamette Research and Extension Center, Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, 15210 NE Miley Road, Aurora, OR 97002, USA)

  • Fumiomi Takeda

    (United States Department of Agriculture, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA)

  • Scott Korthuis

    (Oxbo International Corporation, 270 Birch Bay Lynden Road, Lynden, WA 98264, USA)

  • Changying Li

    (College of Engineering, University of Georgia, 200 D.W. Brooks Drive, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

Abstract

Improved blueberry mechanical harvesting (MH) equipment that maintains fresh market quality are needed due to rising costs and decreasing availability of laborers for harvesting by hand. In 2017, a modified over-the-row (OTR) blueberry harvester with experimental catch surfaces and plates designed to reduce fruit bruising was evaluated. The catch surfaces were made of neoprene (soft catch surface; SCS) or canvas (hard catch surface; HCS) and compared to hand-picked fruit (control). Early- and early/mid-season ‘Duke’ and ‘Draper’, respectively, were evaluated in Oregon, while late-season ‘Elliott’ and ‘Aurora’ were evaluated in Washington. Harvested berries were run through commercial packing lines with fresh pack out recorded and bruise incidence or fresh fruit quality evaluated during various lengths of cold storage. The fresh pack out for ‘Duke’ and ‘Draper’ were 83.5% and 73.2%, respectively, and no difference was noted between SCS and HCS. ‘Duke’ fruit firmness was highest among MH berries with SCS, but firmness decreased in storage after one week. Firmness was highest among hand harvested ‘Draper’ followed by MH with SCS. For ‘Elliott’ and ‘Aurora’, fruit firmness was the same across harvesting methods. ‘Draper’ exhibited more bruising than ‘Duke’, but bruise ratings and the incidence of bruising at ≤10% and ≤20% were similar between hand and MH ‘Draper’ with SCS after 24 h of harvest. ‘Aurora’ berries had similar bruise ratings after 24 h between hand harvesting and MH with SCS, while ‘Elliott’ showed more bruise damage by MH with both SCS and HCS than hand harvested fruit. Although our studies showed slightly lower fresh market blueberry pack outs, loss of firmness, and increased bruise damage in fruit harvested by the experimental MH system compared to hand harvested fruit, higher quality was achieved using SCS compared to HCS. We demonstrated that improved fresh market quality in northern highbush blueberry is achievable by using modified OTR harvesters with SCS and fruit removal by either hand-held pneumatic shakers or rotary drum shakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Wasko DeVetter & Wei Qiang Yang & Fumiomi Takeda & Scott Korthuis & Changying Li, 2019. "Modified Over-the-Row Machine Harvesters to Improve Northern Highbush Blueberry Fresh Fruit Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:13-:d:195611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/1/13/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/1/13/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luca Brondino & Danielle Borra & Nicole Roberta Giuggioli & Stefano Massaglia, 2021. "Mechanized Blueberry Harvesting: Preliminary Results in the Italian Context," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, November.
    2. José Ignacio Rojas-Sola & Gloria del Río-Cidoncha & Ángel Coronil-García, 2020. "Industrial Archaeology Applied to the Study of an Ancient Harvesting Machine: Three-Dimensional Modelling and Virtual Reconstruction," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Steven A. Sargent & Fumiomi Takeda & Jeffrey G. Williamson & Adrian D. Berry, 2019. "Harvest of Southern Highbush Blueberry with a Modified, Over-The-Row Mechanical Harvester: Use of Handheld Shakers and Soft Catch Surfaces," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:13-:d:195611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.