IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2019i1p4-d300685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harvest of Southern Highbush Blueberry with a Modified, Over-The-Row Mechanical Harvester: Use of Handheld Shakers and Soft Catch Surfaces

Author

Listed:
  • Steven A. Sargent

    (Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida/IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

  • Fumiomi Takeda

    (Appalachian Fruit Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA)

  • Jeffrey G. Williamson

    (Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida/IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

  • Adrian D. Berry

    (Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida/IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

Abstract

Fresh market southern highbush blueberries are typically hand-harvested which requires an extensive labor force over a relative short period of time. With rising production costs and labor availability issues, interest in mechanical harvesting options is increasing. In 2017, an over-the-row (OTR) harvester was modified to reduce purchase cost while making hand labor more efficient. The picking heads were removed and dual worker stations were added on each side of the unit. Handheld olive shakers were suspended at each station. Experimental catch plates were installed on one side of the OTR harvester and soft, inclined surfaces over the rigid conveyors on both sides. ‘Meadowlark’ and ‘Farthing’ blueberries were harvested with this system and compared to those manually harvested by a commercial harvest crew. Samples from each harvest method were then commercially cooled and mechanically harvested fruit were commercially packed to determine packout data. Fruit firmness, bruise severity and composition were determined after one day at room temperature (22 °C) and after seven and fourteen days of storage at 1 °C. Average packout was very high for mechanically harvested fruit, 87% for ‘Meadowlark’ and 91% for ‘Farthing’. Initial firmness of both cultivars was lower for mechanically harvested fruit (208 g/mm) than hand-harvested fruit (243 g/mm). Fruit from the three treatments softened during storage, and although ‘Meadowlark’ remained firmer than ‘Farthing’ during storage, there were no differences due to catch surfaces. Hand-harvested fruit had no severe bruising (>20% of cut surface area) at harvest, increasing to 2% after seven days, while mechanically harvested fruit from both fruit collection surfaces had 3% initial severe bruising that increased to 22% during storage. ‘Farthing’ had slightly higher soluble solids content and significantly higher total titratable acidity compared to ‘Meadowlark’. Additional modifications must be made to the next-generation OTR harvester to further reduce blueberry harvest and handling impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven A. Sargent & Fumiomi Takeda & Jeffrey G. Williamson & Adrian D. Berry, 2019. "Harvest of Southern Highbush Blueberry with a Modified, Over-The-Row Mechanical Harvester: Use of Handheld Shakers and Soft Catch Surfaces," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:4-:d:300685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa Wasko DeVetter & Wei Qiang Yang & Fumiomi Takeda & Scott Korthuis & Changying Li, 2019. "Modified Over-the-Row Machine Harvesters to Improve Northern Highbush Blueberry Fresh Fruit Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Ignacio Rojas-Sola & Gloria del Río-Cidoncha & Ángel Coronil-García, 2020. "Industrial Archaeology Applied to the Study of an Ancient Harvesting Machine: Three-Dimensional Modelling and Virtual Reconstruction," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Luca Brondino & Danielle Borra & Nicole Roberta Giuggioli & Stefano Massaglia, 2021. "Mechanized Blueberry Harvesting: Preliminary Results in the Italian Context," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:4-:d:300685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.