Author
Listed:
- Vasileios Greveniotis
(Hellenic Agricultural Organization Demeter, Institute of Industrial and Forage Crops, GR-41335 Larissa, Greece)
- Elisavet Bouloumpasi
(Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Oenology, Democritus University of Thrace, GR-66100 Drama, Greece)
- Adriana Skendi
(Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Oenology, Democritus University of Thrace, GR-66100 Drama, Greece)
- Athanasios Korkovelos
(Directorate of Water Management of Thessaly, Decentralized Administration of Thessaly—Central Greece, GR-41335 Larissa, Greece)
- Dimitrios Kantas
(Department of Animal Science, Campus Gaiopolis, University of Thessaly, GR-41500 Larissa, Greece)
- Constantinos G. Ipsilandis
(Regional Administration of Crete, GR-71201 Heraklion, Greece)
Abstract
It is generally recognized that clovers represent a major nutrient used in ruminants’ diets due to their composition, which is high in protein content and low in fiber content. Investigating the nutritional quality of red and white clover genotypes, and classifying the genetic materials according to their primary quality attributes were the main goals of the current study. During a two-year experiment, we assessed their performance stability. Twelve red clover ( Trifolium pratense L.) and twelve white clover ( Trifolium repens L.) genetic materials were cultivated in a randomized complete block experimental design. Crude protein (CP%), acid detergent fiber (ADF%) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF%) concentrations were measured, and the relative feed value (RFV) was calculated using the estimates of digestible dry matter (DDM%) and potential dry matter intake (DMI% of body weight) of the forage. The average CP% content for white clover varied between 17.18% (REP-4) and 20.55% (REP-9) during the two years of testing. Regarding the red clover, the populations PRA-4, PRA-3, PRA-5, and PRA-10 exhibited the highest CP% content (19.98%) and the lowest ADF% (less than 29%). Although the variation was stable across the years, the profile of this variation of CP, ADF, and NDF for each clover species differs. The CP% was related negatively to ADF% and thus positively to DDM in both species but not with the same allocation, forming different clusters. PRA-3 and PRA-4 for the red clover and REP-5 for the white clover genetic materials exhibited characteristics belonging to the other species studied regarding their content in protein and fiber. Because of their relationship, CP and DDM could be improved simultaneously by breeders. This study revealed that ROZETA and PRA-4 were more stable genetic materials in red clover, and GRASSLANDS HUIA, RIVENDEL, and REP-5 in white clover.
Suggested Citation
Vasileios Greveniotis & Elisavet Bouloumpasi & Adriana Skendi & Athanasios Korkovelos & Dimitrios Kantas & Constantinos G. Ipsilandis, 2025.
"Evaluation and Stability of Red and White Trifolium Species for Nutritional Quality in a Mediterranean Environment,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:391-:d:1589831
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:391-:d:1589831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.