Author
Listed:
- Chen Zhang
(The Biological Feedstuff Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Anhui Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Product Safety Engineering, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230011, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Gangqin Shu
(The Biological Feedstuff Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Yuelushan Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
Guidong County Animal Husbandry and Aquatic Affairs Center, Chenzhou 423500, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Zhigang Zhu
(The Biological Feedstuff Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Anhui Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Product Safety Engineering, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230011, China)
- Yusen Li
(The Biological Feedstuff Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Anhui Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecological Conservation and Pollution Prevention, College of Resources and environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)
- Zhenyu Fang
(The Biological Feedstuff Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Yuelushan Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)
- Liyuan Chen
(Anhui Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Product Safety Engineering, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230011, China)
- Fachun Wan
(Yuelushan Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)
- Yunhua Zhang
(Anhui Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecological Conservation and Pollution Prevention, College of Resources and environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)
- Dingfu Xiao
(Yuelushan Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)
- Lijuan Chen
(The Biological Feedstuff Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the dynamic changes in nutritional components, fermentation parameters, and microbial communities of mulberry leaves during silage fermentation with exogenous and epiphytic Pediococcus pentosaceus ( P. pentosaceus ). P. pentosaceus P (Pp) and P. pentosaceus M (Pm), isolated from the epiphytic microbiota of paper mulberry and mulberry leaves, respectively, were used as fermentation inoculants (OD 600 = 0.6). Fresh mulberry leaves were treated with the inoculants at 1% (mL/g) of leaf weight and ensiled for 60 days. Three groups were established: T1 (exogenous Pp), T2 (epiphytic Pm), and CK (control, sterile water). Samples were collected on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 15, 30, and 60 to analyze chemical composition, fermentation characteristics, and bacterial communities. Redundancy analysis was conducted to explore relationships between fermentation characteristics and bacterial communities. The results showed that T2 had significantly higher dry matter content from day 30 ( p < 0.05) and lower neutral detergent fiber content from day 3 ( p < 0.05) compared to T1. Additionally, T2 exhibited faster water-soluble carbohydrate consumption and more rapid pH decline during the early fermentation phase (days 1–7). Lactic acid (LA) content in T2 was significantly higher during days 1–7 ( p < 0.05), while acetic acid (AA) content was significantly lower from day 3 ( p < 0.05). T2 consistently showed higher crude protein and lower ammonia nitrogen (NH 3 -N) levels than T1 throughout fermentation. Microbial analysis revealed higher abundance of Firmicutes in T2 during days 1–15 and greater relative abundance of Pediococcus from day 1 to 30. Kosakonia was more abundant in T2, whereas Escherichia-Shigella was less abundant. During days 3–15, bacterial communities in T1 and T2 correlated positively with LA, with stronger effects in T2, driven by Pediococcus . In the later stages (days 30 and 60), bacterial communities were influenced by AA, NH 3 -N, and propionic acid, with Enterobacter , Lactobacillus , and Enterococcus as key contributors. This study demonstrates that supplementing epiphytic P. pentosaceus improves fermentation efficiency and nutritional quality of mulberry leaf silage compared to exogenous P. pentosaceus .
Suggested Citation
Chen Zhang & Gangqin Shu & Zhigang Zhu & Yusen Li & Zhenyu Fang & Liyuan Chen & Fachun Wan & Yunhua Zhang & Dingfu Xiao & Lijuan Chen, 2025.
"Dynamic Effects of Exogenous and Epiphytic Pediococcus pentosaceus on Quality and Bacterial Community Succession of Silage Mulberry Leaves,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:16:p:1726-:d:1721916
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:16:p:1726-:d:1721916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.