Author
Listed:
- Kenyi Quispe
(Dirección de Supervisión de Servicios Estratégicos Agrarios, en las Estaciones Experimentales Agrarias, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), Av. La Molina 1981, Lima 15024, Peru)
- Nilton Hermoza
(Dirección de Supervisión de Servicios Estratégicos Agrarios, en las Estaciones Experimentales Agrarias, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), Av. La Molina 1981, Lima 15024, Peru)
- Sharon Mejia
(Dirección de Supervisión de Servicios Estratégicos Agrarios, en las Estaciones Experimentales Agrarias, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), Av. La Molina 1981, Lima 15024, Peru)
- Lorena Estefani Romero-Chavez
(Dirección de Supervisión de Servicios Estratégicos Agrarios, en las Estaciones Experimentales Agrarias—INIA, Av. Marginal Km 74, Pichanaqui 12865, Peru)
- Elvis Ottos
(Dirección de Supervisión de Servicios Estratégicos Agrarios, en las Estaciones Experimentales Agrarias—INIA, Av. Marginal Km 74, Pichanaqui 12865, Peru)
- Andrés Arce
(Jefatura Técnica de Nutrición Vegetal, Gerencia de Desarrollo, Grupo Silvestre, Lima 15067, Peru)
- Richard Solórzano Acosta
(Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Científica del Sur (UCSUR), Lima 15067, Peru)
Abstract
Soil acidity is one of the main limiting factors for coffee production in Peruvian rainforests. The objective of this study is to predict the spatial acidity variability for recommending site-specific liming and phosphorus fertilization treatments. We analyzed thirty-six edaphoclimatic variables, eight methods for estimating liming doses, and three geospatial variables from 552 soil samples in the Pichanaqui district of Peru. Multivariate statistics, nonparametric comparison, and geostatistical analysis with Ordinary Kriging interpolation were used for data analysis. The results showed low coffee yields (0.70 ± 0.16 t ha −1 ) due to soil acidification. The interquartile ranges (IQR) were found to be 3.80–5.10 for pH, 0.21–0.87 cmol Kg −1 for Al +3 , and 2.55–6.53 mg Kg −1 for available P, which are limiting soil conditions for coffee plantations. Moreover, pH, Al +3 , Ca +2 , and organic matter (OM) were the variables with the highest accuracy and quality in the spatial prediction of soil acidity (R 2 between 0.77 and 0.85). The estimation method of liming requirements, MPM (integration of pH and organic material method), obtained the highest correlation with soil acidity-modulating variables and had a high spatial predictability (R 2 = 0.79), estimating doses between 1.50 and 3.01 t ha −1 in soils with organic matter (OM) > 4.00%. The MAC (potential acidity method) method (R 2 = 0.59) estimated liming doses between 0.51 and 0.88 t ha −1 in soils with OM < 4.00% and potential acidity greater than 0.71 cmol Kg −1 . Regarding phosphorus fertilization (DAP), the results showed high requirements (median = 137.21 kg ha −1 , IQR = 8.28 kg ha −1 ), with high spatial predictability (R 2 = 0.74). However, coffee plantations on Ferralsols, with Paleogene parental material, mainly in dry forests, had the lowest predicted fertilization requirements (between 6.92 and 77.55 kg ha −1 of DAP). This research shows a moderate spatial variation of acidity, the need to optimize phosphorus fertilization, and an optimal prediction of liming requirements using the MPM and MAC methods, which indicate high requirements in the southwest of the Pichanaqui district.
Suggested Citation
Kenyi Quispe & Nilton Hermoza & Sharon Mejia & Lorena Estefani Romero-Chavez & Elvis Ottos & Andrés Arce & Richard Solórzano Acosta, 2025.
"Spatial Analysis of Soil Acidity and Available Phosphorus in Coffee-Growing Areas of Pichanaqui: Implications for Liming and Site-Specific Fertilization,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-28, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:15:p:1632-:d:1711673
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:15:p:1632-:d:1711673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.