IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i1p160-d1324022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Climate Change Impacts on Climatic Variables and Reference Evapotranspiration in Tunisian Semi-Arid Region

Author

Listed:
  • Basma Latrech

    (National Research Institute for Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry, University of Carthage, BPN 10, Ariana 2080, Tunisia)

  • Taoufik Hermassi

    (National Research Institute for Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry, University of Carthage, BPN 10, Ariana 2080, Tunisia)

  • Samir Yacoubi

    (National Research Institute for Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry, University of Carthage, BPN 10, Ariana 2080, Tunisia)

  • Adel Slatni

    (National Research Institute for Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry, University of Carthage, BPN 10, Ariana 2080, Tunisia)

  • Fathia Jarray

    (National Research Institute for Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry, University of Carthage, BPN 10, Ariana 2080, Tunisia)

  • Laurent Pouget

    (Water Technological Center, CETAQUA, Ctra. d’Esplugues, 75, Cornellà de Llobregat, 08940 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Mohamed Ali Ben Abdallah

    (National Research Institute for Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry, University of Carthage, BPN 10, Ariana 2080, Tunisia)

Abstract

Systematic biases in general circulation models (GCM) and regional climate models (RCM) impede their direct use in climate change impact research. Hence, the bias correction of GCM-RCMs outputs is a primary step in such studies. This study compares the potential of two bias correction methods (the method from the third phase of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP3) and Detrended Quantile Matching (DQM)) applied to the raw outputs of daily data of minimum and maximum air temperatures and precipitation, in the Cap-Bon region, from eight GCM-RCM combinations. The outputs of GCM/RCM combinations were acquired from the European branch of the coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment (EURO-CORDEX) dataset for historical periods and under two representative concentration pathway (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) scenarios. Furthermore, the best combination of bias correction/GCM-RCM was used to assess the impact of climate change on reference evapotranspiration (ET 0 ). Numerous statistical indicators were considered to evaluate the performance of the bias correction/historical GCM-RCMs compared to the observed data. Trends of the Hargreaves–Samani_ET 0 model during the historical and projected periods were determined using the TFPMK method. A comparison of the bias correction methods revealed that, for all the studied model combinations, ISIMIP3 performs better in reducing biases in monthly precipitation. However, for Tmax and Tmin, the biases are greatly removed when the DQM bias correction method is applied. In general, better results were obtained when the HadCCLM model was used. Before applying bias correction, the set of used GCM-RCMs projected reductions in precipitation for most of the months compared to the reference period (1982–2006). However, Tmin and Tmax are expected to increase in all months and for the three studied periods. Hargreaves–Samani ET 0 values obtained from the best combination (DQM/ HadCCLM) show that RCP8.5 (2075–2098) will exhibit the highest annual ET 0 increase compared to the RCP4.5 scenario and the other periods, with a change rate equal to 11.85% compared to the historical period. Regarding spring and summer seasons, the change rates of ET 0 are expected to reach 10.44 and 18.07%, respectively, under RCP8.5 (2075–2098). This study shows that the model can be used to determine long-term trends in ET 0 patterns for diverse purposes, such as water resources planning, agricultural crop management and irrigation scheduling in the Cap-Bon region.

Suggested Citation

  • Basma Latrech & Taoufik Hermassi & Samir Yacoubi & Adel Slatni & Fathia Jarray & Laurent Pouget & Mohamed Ali Ben Abdallah, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Climate Change Impacts on Climatic Variables and Reference Evapotranspiration in Tunisian Semi-Arid Region," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:160-:d:1324022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/1/160/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/1/160/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jabloun, M. & Sahli, A., 2008. "Evaluation of FAO-56 methodology for estimating reference evapotranspiration using limited climatic data: Application to Tunisia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 707-715, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Guo & Rui Wang & Zhijun Tong & Xingpeng Liu & Jiquan Zhang, 2019. "Dynamic Evaluation and Regionalization of Maize Drought Vulnerability in the Midwest of Jilin Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Mohammad Amin Asadi Zarch, 2022. "Past and Future Global Drought Assessment," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(13), pages 5259-5276, October.
    3. Sentelhas, Paulo C. & Gillespie, Terry J. & Santos, Eduardo A., 2010. "Evaluation of FAO Penman-Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 635-644, May.
    4. Gbalimene Richard Ileberi & Pu Li, 2023. "Integrating Hydrokinetic Energy into Hybrid Renewable Energy System: Optimal Design and Comparative Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Shiri, Jalal, 2017. "Evaluation of FAO56-PM, empirical, semi-empirical and gene expression programming approaches for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration in hyper-arid regions of Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 101-114.
    6. Sofiene B. M. Hammami & Manel Ben Laya & Narjes Baazaoui & Besma Sghaier-Hammami, 2022. "Vegetative Growth Dynamic and Its Impact on the Flowering Intensity of the Following Season Depend on Water Availability and Bearing Status of the Olive Tree," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Paredes, Paula & Trigo, Isabel & de Bruin, Henk & Simões, Nuno & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Daily grass reference evapotranspiration with Meteosat Second Generation shortwave radiation and reference ET products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    8. Aouissi, Jalel & Benabdallah, Sihem & Lili Chabaâne, Zohra & Cudennec, Christophe, 2016. "Evaluation of potential evapotranspiration assessment methods for hydrological modelling with SWAT—Application in data-scarce rural Tunisia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 39-51.
    9. Matin Ahooghalandari & Mehdi Khiadani & Mina Esmi Jahromi, 2016. "Developing Equations for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration in Australia," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(11), pages 3815-3828, September.
    10. Raziei, Tayeb & Pereira, Luis S., 2013. "Estimation of ETo with Hargreaves–Samani and FAO-PM temperature methods for a wide range of climates in Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-18.
    11. Gonçalo C. Rodrigues & Ricardo P. Braga, 2021. "A Simple Procedure to Estimate Reference Evapotranspiration during the Irrigation Season in a Hot-Summer Mediterranean Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Viktor Dubovský & Dagmar Dlouhá & Lukáš Pospíšil, 2020. "The Calibration of Evaporation Models against the Penman–Monteith Equation on Lake Most," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Berti, Antonio & Tardivo, Gianmarco & Chiaudani, Alessandro & Rech, Francesco & Borin, Maurizio, 2014. "Assessing reference evapotranspiration by the Hargreaves method in north-eastern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 20-25.
    14. Valle Júnior, Luiz C.G. & Ventura, Thiago M. & Gomes, Raphael S.R. & de S. Nogueira, José & de A. Lobo, Francisco & Vourlitis, George L. & Rodrigues, Thiago R., 2020. "Comparative assessment of modelled and empirical reference evapotranspiration methods for a brazilian savanna," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    15. Cruz-Blanco, M. & Lorite, I.J. & Santos, C., 2014. "An innovative remote sensing based reference evapotranspiration method to support irrigation water management under semi-arid conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 135-145.
    16. Traore, Seydou & Wang, Yu-Min & Kerh, Tienfuan, 2010. "Artificial neural network for modeling reference evapotranspiration complex process in Sudano-Sahelian zone," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 707-714, May.
    17. Yang, Guijun & Pu, Ruiliang & Zhao, Chunjiang & Xue, Xuzhang, 2014. "Estimating high spatiotemporal resolution evapotranspiration over a winter wheat field using an IKONOS image based complementary relationship and Lysimeter observations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 34-43.
    18. Luo, Yufeng & Chang, Xiaomin & Peng, Shizhang & Khan, Shahbaz & Wang, Weiguang & Zheng, Qiang & Cai, Xueliang, 2014. "Short-term forecasting of daily reference evapotranspiration using the Hargreaves–Samani model and temperature forecasts," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 42-51.
    19. Paredes, P. & Pereira, L.S. & Almorox, J. & Darouich, H., 2020. "Reference grass evapotranspiration with reduced data sets: Parameterization of the FAO Penman-Monteith temperature approach and the Hargeaves-Samani equation using local climatic variables," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    20. de Oliveira, Renan G. & Valle Júnior, Luiz Claudio G. & da Silva, Jonh Billy & Espíndola, Duani A.L.F. & Lopes, Rute D. & Nogueira, José S. & Curado, Leone F.A. & Rodrigues, Thiago R., 2021. "Temporal trend changes in reference evapotranspiration contrasting different land uses in southern Amazon basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:160-:d:1324022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.