Author
Listed:
- Joel José de Andrade
(Department of Agronomy, Postgraduate Program in Soil Science, Universidade Federal Rural de Penambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil)
- Emídio Cantídio Almeida de Oliveira
(Department of Agronomy, Postgraduate Program in Soil Science, Universidade Federal Rural de Penambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil)
- Amanda Michele dos Santos Lima
(Department of Agronomy, Postgraduate Program in Soil Science, Universidade Federal Rural de Penambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil)
- Gabriela Priscila Sena Amorim
(Department of Agronomy, Postgraduate Program in Soil Science, Universidade Federal Rural de Penambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil)
- Ester Souza Oliveira
(Department of Agronomy, Postgraduate Program in Soil Science, Universidade Federal Rural de Penambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil)
- Fernando José Freire
(Department of Agronomy, Postgraduate Program in Soil Science, Universidade Federal Rural de Penambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil)
- Wagner Sandro de Moura Adelino
(Japungu Agroindutrial, Santa Rita 58300-970, Brazil)
- Emídio Cantídio Almeida de Oliveira Filho
(Department of Agronomy, Postgraduate Program in Soil Science, Universidade Federal Rural de Penambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil)
Abstract
Increasing the recovery of N fertilizer (RNf) is the main challenge in managing nitrogen fertilization in sugarcane. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of complementary foliar fertilization in managing nitrogen nutrition in sugarcane. Four fertilization managements, combining soil (5.0 and 4.5 g plot −1 of N) and foliar (1.0 and 1.5 g plot −1 of N) fertilization in up to two application events (0.5 + 0.5 and 0.75 + 0.75 g plot −1 of N), were compared with conventional fertilization (6.0 g plot −1 of N in soil). The change from 6.0 g plot −1 to 4.5 g plot −1 of N reduced the RNf by 46% before the first foliar fertilization. The RNf (26%) was similar between managements after the first foliar fertilization. After the second foliar fertilization, the RNf was 38% higher than that for conventional management. The accumulation of N in the aerial part of sugarcane was similar between managements until the first foliar fertilization. After the second foliar fertilization, the accumulation of N increased by 3.5% with foliar fertilization. The biomass accumulated by the managements was similar before and after the first and second foliar fertilization. The splitting of foliar fertilization increased the accumulation of N and RNf by 22% and 24%, respectively. The fertilization management with 4.5 g plot −1 of N applied to the soil, with two applications of 0.75 g plot −1 of N on the leaf, obtained greater accumulations of N and RNf. Foliar fertilization increases the efficiency of fertilization and improves the N nutrition of sugarcane.
Suggested Citation
Joel José de Andrade & Emídio Cantídio Almeida de Oliveira & Amanda Michele dos Santos Lima & Gabriela Priscila Sena Amorim & Ester Souza Oliveira & Fernando José Freire & Wagner Sandro de Moura Adeli, 2024.
"Foliar Fertilization Improves the Nitrogen Nutrition of Sugarcane,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:1984-:d:1514546
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:1984-:d:1514546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.