IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i6p803-d830113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial and Temporal Variations in the Ecological Efficiency and Ecosystem Service Value of Agricultural Land in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shili Guo

    (School of Economics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Zhiyong Hu

    (West Institute for Economic Research, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Hanzhe Ma

    (West Institute for Economic Research, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Dingde Xu

    (Sichuan Central for Rural Development Research, College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Renwei He

    (Institute of City Situation Survey Research, Beijing Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

In-depth analysis of spatial and temporal variations in the ecological efficiency of agricultural land has important theoretical and practical significance in achieving the efficient utilization of agricultural land, the coordinated development of natural resources and the environment, and the formulation of sustainable agricultural development policies. By including carbon emissions and pollution as undesired output indicators of agricultural land use, and introducing ecological service values as output indicators, an SBM-Undesirable model which can not only avoid the deviation caused by the difference of radial and angular selection, but also reflect the essence of efficiency evaluation, was used to estimate the ecological efficiency of agricultural land in 30 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions of China from 2004 to 2017. Spatial and temporal differences were then analyzed. The results show that (1) The ecological efficiency of agricultural land in China decreased overall from 2004 to 2017. (2) The eco-efficiency of agricultural land was highest in the eastern provinces, lowest in the central provinces, and moderate in the western provinces. (3) Among the input indicators, the input redundancy rates of agricultural land, chemical fertilizer input and agricultural film input were too high. (4) China’s agricultural land use has not evolved towards harmonious development of the environment and economy. Due to the excessive use of chemical fertilizers, agricultural films and other factors that cause pollution, there has been a one-sided increase in the economic output of agricultural land, and improvements in ecological value have been inhibited. Based on the research results, feasible suggestions are put forward to improve the ecological efficiency of agricultural land in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Shili Guo & Zhiyong Hu & Hanzhe Ma & Dingde Xu & Renwei He, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Variations in the Ecological Efficiency and Ecosystem Service Value of Agricultural Land in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:803-:d:830113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/6/803/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/6/803/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui Zhang & Lingling Zhang & Meijuan He & Zongzhi Wang, 2023. "Spatial Association Network and Driving Factors of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency in the Hanjiang River Basin, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Xiuju Feng & Jian Gao & Jittaporn Sriboonjit & Zhongmin Wang & Jianxu Liu & Songsak Sriboonchitta, 2023. "The Impact of Urbanization on Cultivated Land Use Efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Carlos Rosano-Peña & João Vitor Borges Silva & André Luiz Marques Serrano & José Eustáquio Ribeiro Vieira Filho & Herbert Kimura, 2022. "Eco-Efficiency of Agriculture in the Amazon Biome: Robust Indices and Determinants," World, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Shilin Li & Zhiyuan Zhu & Zhenzhong Dai & Jiajia Duan & Danmeng Wang & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Differentiation and Driving Factors of China’s Agricultural Eco-Efficiency Considering Agricultural Carbon Sinks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:803-:d:830113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.