IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v7y2017i2p19-d100871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing Gender Diversity in Senior Roles in HE: Who Is Afraid of Positive Action?

Author

Listed:
  • Simonetta Manfredi

    (Business School, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK)

Abstract

This article argues that Higher Education Institutions should adopt positive action in recruitment and promotion to tackle women’s under-representation in senior leadership roles. In a tie-break situation where two candidates are “as qualified as each other”, section 159 of the UK Equality Act 2010 allows employers to give preference to a candidate from an under-represented group. The use of this measure, however, is often contested on the grounds that it is a form of reverse discrimination, it is tokenistic and that it can undermine meritocracy. This article seeks to challenge these objections and suggests that, far from undermining meritocracy, the use of positive action in recruitment and promotion could prove a useful tool to tackle gender bias, unpack stereotypes and re-appraise how merit is defined and assessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Simonetta Manfredi, 2017. "Increasing Gender Diversity in Senior Roles in HE: Who Is Afraid of Positive Action?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:19-:d:100871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/7/2/19/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/7/2/19/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eugene Judson & Lydia Ross & Kristi Glassmeyer, 2019. "How Research, Teaching, and Leadership Roles are Recommended to Male and Female Engineering Faculty Differently," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(7), pages 1025-1047, November.
    2. Raquel Garde Sánchez & Jesús Mauricio Flórez-Parra & María Victoria López-Pérez & Antonio Manuel López-Hernández, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Disclosure of Information on Corporate Social Responsibility: An Analysis of the Top 200 Universities in the Shanghai Ranking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Karen A. Longman, 2018. "Perspectives on Women’s Higher Education Leadership from Around the World," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-6, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:19-:d:100871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.