IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fli/journl/0311-6336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bargaining for welfare: Gender consequences of Australia's dual welfare model

Author

Listed:
  • Jefferson, T
  • Preston, A

Abstract

"The tradition in Australia of delivering welfare benefits through the industrial relations system rather than through social insurance schemes has important implications for coverage and adequacy of important forms of income protection and maintenance. Using data from a large-scale survey, this paper examines access to two forms of social benefit: paid maternity/paternity leave and retirement income in the form of occupational superannuation. Patterns of coverage indicate that those with limited bargaining power in the labour market are more likely to miss out on these benefits. These results indicate a necessity for maintaining the coverage and level of benefits available through publicly provided schemes such as the Aged Pension. The findings also support the current push for a nationally legislated, government funded, paid maternity leave scheme."

Suggested Citation

  • Jefferson, T & Preston, A, 2003. "Bargaining for welfare: Gender consequences of Australia's dual welfare model," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 29(1), pages 76-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:fli:journl:0311-6336
    Note: Jefferson, T., Preston, A., 2003. Bargaining for welfare: Gender consequences of Australia's dual welfare model. Australian Bulletin of Labour, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 76-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/0311-6336
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alison Preston & John Burgess, 2003. "Women’s Work in Australia: Trends, Issues and Prospects," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 6(4), pages 497-518, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fli:journl:0311-6336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rupali Saikia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nilflau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.