Goodwill accounting as a missing link between financial and management accounting: literature review and research agenda
The main objective of this paper is to deal with the relationship between financial and management accounting concerning goodwill accounting. In this research I referred to the existing literature on goodwill accounting, impairment losses, and impairment testing, considering both the amortization and the impairment era in order to understand how interrelationships between financial and management accounting based on goodwill accounting were investigated theoretically. The results of the review still show a lack of dialogue in the accounting research. Even though the scant empirical evidence of operating practice within the companies demonstrate a natural linkage during the impairment era, internal and external reporting are still considered as two separate domains. This result, more logical in the amortization era, denotes by now a relevant gap in accounting research and it is time to pose some relevant research questions to open up an interdisciplinary (internal and external reporting) view. It is possible that the development of this new strand of research helps to advance our knowledge of business on many fronts. I refer to the advancement necessary to explain the mixed results of financial accounting studies such as the controversial value relevance of write-offs or the reason for opportunistic behavior in goodwill accounting, to interpret how financial accounting rules influence management accounting and, in the opposite sense, how management accounting represents a relevant factor in determining the financial reporting environment. A less myopic view, more open to a comparison between management and financial accounting, will also help standard setters , to understand if their rules require the disclosure of already adopted internal practices, if they favor company managerial growth, or if they add new and too sophisticated administrative tasks, too far from the current state of managerial thinking.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 2011/3 Supp (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 Supp ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.asp?IDRivista=163|
|Order Information:|| Web: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Elenco_Prodotti.aspx?startCode=DC Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:frfrfr:v:html10.3280/fr2011-su003002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angelo Ventriglia)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.