IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/ecaqec/vhtml10.3280-ecag2010-002006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualità e sicurezza alimentare: ratio legis o paradosso per i prodotti biologici?

Author

Listed:
  • Sabrina Giuca

Abstract

Reforming legislation on organic food production, eu shows sensitive to consumers expectations about organic food: tracking and control, methods that respect rhythm of nature and improve maintenance of biodiversity. As a consequence it institutionalizes general objectives on the ec Regulation 834/2007: it establishes a sustainable management system for agriculture that aims at producing products and food of high quality that does not harm environment, human health, plant health or animal health. Generally speaking, looking at food quality and safety, can it be said that eu policy increasingly assigns to organic food such aims of quality and safety of production? With the aim to contribute to the debate on the concept of quality, which in the context of Common legislation lacks legal precision and it is often confused with food safety and hygiene baseline standards, the study highlights the inconsistency of the rules on organic farming. In fact, even if the regulation is strongly inspired by food quality and safety, it admits, like conventional food and feed, adventitious presence of gmos in organic product, its ingredients or feed materials, and so it may reduce ethics contents. Present analysis shows that in the eu strategy for food does not seem to be strictly coherent between horizontal (which takes into account, inter alia, the protection of human health and the environment, and sectoral legislation on gmos) and special legislation orphan of uniform and binding rules on the coexistence between conventional, organic and gm crops, despite the new, more flexible approach of the European Commission. The study focuses on eu recent guidelines that provide for measures to restrict space in organic products gm content to levels below the current thresholds. However, given that specificity of organic products does not affect only farmers’ income but, as the Green Paper on agricultural product quality, also consumers expectations, only a revision of the regulation may offer unique solutions for all the Member States.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabrina Giuca, 2010. "Qualità e sicurezza alimentare: ratio legis o paradosso per i prodotti biologici?," ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 12(2), pages 75-99.
  • Handle: RePEc:fan:ecaqec:v:html10.3280/ecag2010-002006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=41299&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/inglese_download_credit.asp

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Blasi, Giuseppe & Seccia, Antonio & Carlucci, Domenico & Santeramo, Fabio G., 2007. "Analysis of Italian High Quality Wine Exports using the Gravity Model Approach," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7901, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:ecaqec:v:html10.3280/ecag2010-002006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angelo Ventriglia). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.asp?IDRivista=87 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.