IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/ccadaa/vhtml10.3280-cca2019-001004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The forgotten origins of social accounting: Two pioneering U.S. models of the early 1970s

Author

Listed:
  • Gianfranco Rusconi

Abstract

Various countries have adopted pioneering social accounting with different approaches and projects. This analysis concentrates specifically on U.S. account-ing research. The source of this study is U.S. accounting journals of the 1970s, which pub-lished papers studying data and information about the social and environmental effects of firms? activities. This is a crucial and very often forgotten step in the his-tory of accounting theories and practices, because it shows that, despite some limits and flaws, accounting culture had a sound basis for the birth of social ac-counting. This study focuses particularly on two pioneering models of that time, namely, those of Linowes (1973) and Epstein, Flamholtz, and McDonough (1976), which were developed at a time when the term ?social accounting? was unknown or misunderstood. These models are chosen because they were strictly and coher-ently led by the notion of the accounting nature of social/sustainability accounting. Therefore, the research aim of this study is to show that these two pioneering models of the 1970s are historically important for affirming the role of accounting research and profession in social/sustainability accounting, particularly for helping to tackle managerial capture and greenwashing.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianfranco Rusconi, 2019. "The forgotten origins of social accounting: Two pioneering U.S. models of the early 1970s," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 61-84.
  • Handle: RePEc:fan:ccadaa:v:html10.3280/cca2019-001004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=64291&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Medawar, Charles, 1976. "The social audit: A political view," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 389-394, October.
    2. Grojer, Jan-Erik & Stark, Agneta, 1977. "Social accounting: A Swedish attempt," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 349-385, October.
    3. Dave Owen, 2014. "The Evolution of Social Reporting: The 'Early Days'," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 75-80, September.
    4. Epstein, Marc & Flamholtz, Eric & McDonough, John J., 1976. "Corporate social accounting in the United States of America: State of the art and future prospects," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 23-42, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gray, Rob, 2002. "The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 687-708, October.
    2. Matthias S. Fifka, 2013. "Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 1-35, January.
    3. Patrycja Hąbek & Radosław Wolniak, 2016. "Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 399-420, January.
    4. Hamad Alhumoudi, 2017. "External Social Accounting Developments: Analysis and Discussion of Academic Critiques," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(1), pages 33-45, June.
    5. Christopher Humphrey, 2008. "Auditing research: a review across the disciplinary divide," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(2), pages 170-203, February.
    6. Burnett, Royce D. & Hansen, Don R., 2008. "Ecoefficiency: Defining a role for environmental cost management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 551-581, August.
    7. Teresa Eugénio & Isabel Costa Lourenço & Ana Isabel Morais, 2010. "Recent developments in social and environmental accounting research," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 286-305, June.
    8. Ataur Belal & Robin Roberts, 2010. "Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Reporting in Bangladesh," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 311-324, December.
    9. Carol A. Adams & Carlos Larrinaga‐González, 2007. "Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 333-355, June.
    10. David Collison & Colin Dey & Gwen Hannah & Lorna Stevenson, 2010. "Anglo‐American capitalism: the role and potential role of social accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(8), pages 956-981, October.
    11. David Owen, 2008. "Chronicles of wasted time?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(2), pages 240-267, February.
    12. Brown, Judy, 2009. "Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 313-342.
    13. Yuanfeng Wang & Bo Pang & Xiangjie Zhang & Jingjing Wang & Yinshan Liu & Chengcheng Shi & Shuowen Zhou, 2020. "Life Cycle Environmental Costs of Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Faris Nasif AL- Shubiri & Abedalfattah Zuhair Al-Abedallat & Marwan Mohammad Abu Orabi, 2012. "Financial and Non Financial Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 2(8), pages 1001-1012.
    15. Muhammad Azizul Islam & Craig Deegan & Rob Gray, 2018. "Social compliance audits and multinational corporation supply chain: evidence from a study of the rituals of social audits," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 190-224, February.
    16. Dewi Sri Sejati & Budi Eko Soetjipto & Wening Patmi Rahayu, 2017. "Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility Program for Education in Government Banking of Malang," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(6), pages 39-51, June.
    17. George, Sendirella & Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse, 2023. "Social movement activists’ conceptions of political action and counter-accounting through a critical dialogic accounting and accountability lens," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Andrea Coulson & Ian Thomson, 2006. "Accounting and sustainability, encouraging a dialogical approach; integrating learning activities, delivery mechanisms and assessment strategies," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 261-273.
    19. Baker, C. Richard, 2014. "Breakdowns of accountability in the face of natural disasters: The case of Hurricane Katrina," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 620-632.
    20. Deegan, Craig, 2017. "Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives of Accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 65-87.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:ccadaa:v:html10.3280/cca2019-001004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=178 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.