IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i3p94-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Organizational Attitudes Toward Counterproductive Work Behaviors Across Culture Types: Insights From the OCAI Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Szeliga-Duchnowska
  • Miroslawa Szewczyk

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between organisational culture type (as defined by the OCAI model) and perceived organisational attitudes towards counterproductive work behaviours (CWB). Particular attention is given to three dimensions of organisational responses: the use of sanctions, tolerance, and encouragement of counterproductive behaviours. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study is based on survey data collected from employees representing organisations characterised by different culture types (clan, adhocracy, market, hierarchy). Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc analyses to assess differences in organisational attitudes towards CWB. Findings: The results indicate that organisational culture type significantly differentiates the levels of tolerance and encouragement of CWB. No significant differences were observed regarding the use of sanctions, which may suggest the existence of a universal accountability mechanism for counterproductive behaviours. Practical Implications: Organisations should adapt their CWB prevention systems to the specific profile of their organisational culture, especially in structures focused on efficiency and formalism, where ethical norms may be marginalised. Strengthening ethical leadership and fostering coherent cultural values may reduce the risk of tolerating or promoting unethical conduct. Originality/Value: The originality of this study lies in its integration of the OCAI typology of organisational cultures with employees’ perceptions of three specific organisational reactions to CWB: sanctioning, tolerating, and encouraging. Unlike previous research that has focused on formal ethical codes or policy declarations, this study explores informal and subjectively perceived cultural signals that may either foster or inhibit counterproductive behaviours. This approach contributes a novel perspective to the field of organisational ethics and workplace culture research.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Szeliga-Duchnowska & Miroslawa Szewczyk, 2025. "Perceived Organizational Attitudes Toward Counterproductive Work Behaviors Across Culture Types: Insights From the OCAI Framework," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 94-107.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:3:p:94-107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/4035/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • J59 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Other
    • L29 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:3:p:94-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.