IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i2p424-440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dark Side of EU Mobility Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Malecka
  • Malgorzata Alicja Kozlowska
  • Katarzyna Brozek
  • Monika Grodecka
  • Adam Kolinski

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the publication is to determine synthetic indicators for assessing the intensity of the adverse impacts of the transport sector in the EU Member States. The aim is therefore to fill a research gap by quantitatively assessing the aforementioned indicators across all EU Member States, thus enabling the identification of replicable patterns, national specificities and the degree of dispersion of negative transport impacts. Design/Methodology/Approach: A multidimensional comparative analysis - Hwlwig's medel - was used to meet the objective, reflecting the possibility of developing a synthetic indicator combining three key dimensions of negative transport impacts. Secondary data from European monitoring (CO₂ emissions, transport energy consumption, road fatalities) were analysed, converted to per capita values and then aggregated into a single scale for assessing socio-environmental burden. Findings: The indicator developed, which is synthetic in nature, shows differences between EU countries. The best results are achieved by Germany, Denmark, Estonia and Finland, among others, which simultaneously reduce emissions, manage energy rationally and maintain a high level of safety. The value of the index also indicates countries with an urgent need to modernise and reform their transport systems, such as Romania. Practical Implications: The results of the survey can serve decision-makers as a tool to identify: (1) good management practices and (2) areas in need of financial and (3) legislative support. The proposed synthetic indicator facilitates comparing the effectiveness of transport policies and monitoring progress towards sustainability and sustainable mobility goals. Originality/Value: The study fills a gap in the literature by integrating the environmental and social costs of transport into a single, comparative measure for all EU countries. Such a holistic view of the three main dimensions of transport impacts is rare and adds value to the design of integrated transport policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Malecka & Malgorzata Alicja Kozlowska & Katarzyna Brozek & Monika Grodecka & Adam Kolinski, 2025. "The Dark Side of EU Mobility Growth," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 424-440.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:2:p:424-440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3988/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sustainable transport; SD; European Union; Competitiveness.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q49 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Other
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R13 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - General Equilibrium and Welfare Economic Analysis of Regional Economies
    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods
    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:2:p:424-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.