IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxixy2016i2p171-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives of Development of Agriculture in Crisis by the Example of Present-Day Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Y. Kozenko
  • Z. Kozenko
  • A. Bobicheva
  • K. Kozenko
  • M. Filin

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to determine perspectives of development of agriculture in crisis by the example of modern Russia. The authors offer a methodology of complex evaluation of economic dynamics of agriculture in crisis which supposes aggregated evaluation of growth rates of key economic indicators systematized by four groups of evaluation parameters of overcoming the crisis situation. The authors also develop a model of formation of organizational and economic mechanism of sustainable development of agriculture in crisis. As a result of the research, the authors come to the conclusion that in order to overcome crisis phenomena, it is necessary to systemically implement the offered mechanisms of sustainable development of agriculture and corresponding strategic directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Y. Kozenko & Z. Kozenko & A. Bobicheva & K. Kozenko & M. Filin, 2016. "Perspectives of Development of Agriculture in Crisis by the Example of Present-Day Russia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 171-178.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xix:y:2016:i:2:p:171-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ersj.eu/repec/ers/papers/16_2_p18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Áine Regan & Monique Raats & Liran Christine Shan & Patrick G. Wall & Áine McConnon, 2016. "Risk communication and social media during food safety crises: a study of stakeholders' opinions in Ireland," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 119-133, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Zhu & Xiaowei Wen & May Chu & Gongliang Zhang & Xuefan Liu, 2021. "Consumers’ Food Safety Risk Communication on Social Media Following the Suan Tang Zi Accident: An Extended Protection Motivation Theory Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Meyerding, Stephan G.H. & Spiwoks, Elisabeth & Rombach, Meike & Lehberger, Mira, 2019. "Not only speed matters – Crisis response in the hypothetical case of a transport accident involving genetically modified crops," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 55-63.
    3. Jinghao Chen & Qianxi Liu & Xiaoyan Liu & Youfeng Wang & Huizi Nie & Xiankun Xie, 2023. "Exploring the Functioning of Online Self-Organizations during Public Health Emergencies: Patterns and Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Comrie, E.L. & Burns, C. & Coulson, A.B. & Quigley, J. & Quigley, K.F., 2019. "Rationalising the use of Twitter by official organisations during risk events: Operationalising the Social Amplification of Risk Framework through causal loop diagrams," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 792-801.
    5. Dominic Balog‐Way & Katherine McComas & John Besley, 2020. "The Evolving Field of Risk Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2240-2262, November.
    6. Pérez-Mesa, Juan Carlos & García Barranco, Mª Carmen & Serrano-Arcos, Mª Mar, 2023. "The agri-food crisis in the post-truth age: an application to the Spanish greenhouse sector," MPRA Paper 119882, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xix:y:2016:i:2:p:171-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.