Innovative Organizational Forms that Add Value to Both Organizations and Community: The Case of Knowledge Management
The foundation of new economies has shifted from natural resources to intellectual assets and top managers have been forced to focus on Knowledge Management that has been acknowledged as the most important resource and capability of modern firms’ advancement. Knowledge-creating companies may establish a sustainable competitive advantage in the turbulent business environment where markets shift, competitors multiply and products may be outdated almost overnight. Additionally, knowledge can help companies to enjoy improved levels of business competitiveness due to their ability to respond to their customers’ needs, create new markets, develop innovative products and finally dominate ambitious technologies. Through knowledge, conventional firms and organizations may break up their limitations, improve their national and local economic and social development and also create healthier employment chances. In this context, knowledge society can also be viewed as the society that is basically attached to knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing and knowledge application in order to improve prosperity and well being of people. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the ways knowledge management may increase the performance of modern firms and organizations, support the creation of more and better jobs and promote equal opportunities and gender equality in a more integrative society. Data from actual cases have been employed in order to provide an empirical support to the theoretical development of a conceptual model.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- John MacDuffie, 1995. "Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 48(2), pages 197-221, January.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xiv:y:2011:i:2:p:81-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eleni Giannakopoulou)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.