IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijebaa/vviiiy2020ispecial1p178-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Paradigm of Public Administration and its Development in Conditions of State Formation and Changes

Author

Listed:
  • Mykola O. Durman
  • Alla H. Bashtannyk
  • Viktoria Kornienko
  • Azad E. Omarov
  • Svitlana H. Levchenko

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of this article is to study the processes of public administration and determine which concept of public administration should be taken as a basis. The development of the paradigm of public administration and its best practices is considered. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study is based on a comprehensive approach to study the evolution of paradigms of public administration and the peculiarities of their application. It is noted that "directive public administration" (DPA), "new public management" (NPM), and "Good Governance" (GG) are progressive concepts for their time. This evolution is the development of public administration as a subsystem of the social system "state". Findings: Being based on the analysis, the author proposed an improved model of transition from directive public administration through new public management to good governance (DPA - NPM - GG). This makes it possible to see the evolution of the public administration paradigm, as well as to identify the positive aspects of each of the concepts used in the public administration paradigm. This makes it possible to see the evolution of the public administration paradigm, as well as to identify the positive aspects of each of the concepts used in the public administration paradigm. Practical Implications: As the main conclusion, it is noted that there is an opportunity for Ukraine to go quickly through the path of NPM and immediately begin to implement the concept of GG in public administration in modern conditions of state formation. It is espessialy important in the situation of the European and Euro-Atlantic integration of Ukraine. Originality/Value: The research findings demonstrate that the use of advanced paradigms can significantly increase the efficiency of public administration and make it "human-oriented", as most of the provisions of the GG put the interaction of government and the public in the first place.

Suggested Citation

  • Mykola O. Durman & Alla H. Bashtannyk & Viktoria Kornienko & Azad E. Omarov & Svitlana H. Levchenko, 2020. "The Paradigm of Public Administration and its Development in Conditions of State Formation and Changes," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 1), pages 178-189.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:viii:y:2020:i:special1:p:178-189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijeba.com/journal/535/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mike Marinetto, 2003. "Governing beyond the Centre: A Critique of the Anglo‐Governance School," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51(3), pages 592-608, October.
    2. Mike Marinetto, 2003. "Governing beyond the Centre: A Critique of the Anglo-Governance School," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51, pages 592-608, October.
    3. Dogaru, Tatiana-Camelia, 2016. "The Effect of Public Administration Reforms under the Post-New Public Management Paradigm," MPRA Paper 94399, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan S. Davies & Madeleine Pill, 2012. "Hollowing Out Neighbourhood Governance? Rescaling Revitalisation in Baltimore and Bristol," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(10), pages 2199-2217, August.
    2. Jonathan S Davies, 2012. "Network Governance Theory: A Gramscian Critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2687-2704, November.
    3. Alexander Nurse & Matthew Fulton, 2017. "Delivering strategic economic development in a time of urban austerity: European Union structural funds and the English city regions," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(3), pages 164-182, May.
    4. Valeria Guarneros-Meza, 2008. "Local Governance in Mexico: The Cases of Two Historic-centre Partnerships," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1011-1035, May.
    5. Aurora Castro Teixeira & Maria João Barros, 2014. "Local municipalities’ involvement in promoting the internationalisation of SMEs," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(1-2), pages 141-162, February.
    6. Lyall, Catherine & Tait, Joyce, 2019. "Beyond the limits to governance: New rules of engagement for the tentative governance of the life sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1128-1137.
    7. Abida Ellahi & Mobashar Rehman & Yasir Javed & Fahd Sultan & Hafiz Mudassir Rehman, 2022. "Impact of Servant Leadership on Project Success Through Mediating Role of Team Motivation and Effectiveness: A Case of Software Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    8. Louise Reardon, 2018. "Networks and problem recognition: advancing the Multiple Streams Approach," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 457-476, December.
    9. Mike Geddes, 2010. "Building and Contesting Neoliberalism at the Local Level: Reflections on the Symposium and on Recent Experience in Bolivia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 163-173, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public administration paradigm; evolution of public administration paradigm; directive public administration; new public management; good governance.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • C4 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:viii:y:2020:i:special1:p:178-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijeba.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.