IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU and member states diplomacies in Moldova and Ukraine: Examining EU diplomatic performance post-Lisbon

Author

Listed:
  • Baltag, Dorina and Michael Smith

Abstract

The Lisbon Treaty proclaims the need for a stronger, more efficient, more coherent European Union (EU) in the international arena. In the area of external relations, the post-Lisbon EU embraces the unification of the diplomatic efforts of the European Commission, the Council Secretariat and that of the EU member states with the aim of achieving greater coherence. This vision is one of cooperation not only in Brussels but also in third countries. While the Brussels-based part of the European External Action Service (EEAS) has captured the attention of both academic and non-academic literature, the development of the relationship between the EU and national diplomatic services in third countries has received less attention. This article assesses the nature of interaction between member state embassies and the EU delegations in Moldova and Ukraine, two Eastern European countries on the EU’s immediate border, where EU ambitions are high. By deploying concepts of efficiency and effectiveness, the article examines how this interaction takes place and whether it adds to the EU’s aim of achieving greater coherence in external relations. The empirical analysis shows that EU diplomatic performance has reached a certain degree of administrative efficiency, yet there are several challenges to be addressed on the level of effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Baltag, Dorina and Michael Smith, 2015. "EU and member states diplomacies in Moldova and Ukraine: Examining EU diplomatic performance post-Lisbon," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2015-005a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2015-005.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tamar Gutner & Alexander Thompson, 2010. "The politics of IO performance: A framework," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 227-248, September.
    2. Charles Lusthaus & Fred Carden & Marie-Hélène Adrien & Gary Anderson & George Plinio Montalván, 2002. "Organizational Assessment: A Framework for Improving Performance," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 79941, February.
    3. Lusthaus, Charles & Carden, Fred & Adrien, Marie-Hélène & Anderson, Gary & Montalván, George Plinio, 2002. "Organizational Assessment: A Framework for Improving Performance," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 446.
    4. Furness, Mark & Vollmer, Frank, 2013. "EU joint programming: lessons from South Sudan for EU aid coordination," Briefing Papers 18/2013, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Selianko, Iulii and Andrea Lenschow, 2015. "Energy policy coherence from an intra-institutional perspective: Energy security and environmental policy coordination within the European Commission," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 19, January.
    2. Vanhoonacker, Sophie and Christine Neuhold, 2015. "Dynamics of institutional cooperation in the European Union: Dimensions and effects. An Introduction," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iulian Romanyshyn, 2015. "Explaining EU Effectiveness in Multilateral Institutions: The Case of the Arms Trade Treaty Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 875-892, July.
    2. Md. Aktar Kamal & Noor Nahar Begum, 2019. "A multivariate analysis of human capital: evidence from readymade garments industry of Bangladesh," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(3), pages 46-64, March.
    3. Mark Pollack & Emilie Hafner-Burton, 2010. "Mainstreaming international governance: The environment, gender, and IO performance in the European Union," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 285-313, September.
    4. Michael Zürn & Alexandros Tokhi & Martin Binder, 2021. "The International Authority Database," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(4), pages 430-442, September.
    5. Martin Binder & Monika Heupel, 2020. "Rising Powers, UN Security Council Reform, and the Failure of Rhetorical Coercion," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 93-103, October.
    6. Zbigniew Brodziński & Piotr Bórawski & James W Dunn, 2017. "Development of Non-Governmental Organizations in Poland," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 11(4), December.
    7. Ms. Ghada Fayad & Chengyu Huang & Yoko Shibuya & Peng Zhao, 2020. "How Do Member Countries Receive IMF Policy Advice: Results from a State-of-the-art Sentiment Index," IMF Working Papers 2020/007, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Julia Gray & Jonathan Slapin, 2012. "How effective are preferential trade agreements? Ask the experts," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 309-333, September.
    9. Alao T.O. & Aina O.O., 2020. "Organisational culture of construction companies in Lagos State, Nigeria," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 2158-2169, January.
    10. Zürn, Michael & Tokhi, Alexandros & Binder, Martin, 2021. "The International Authority Database," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 430-442.
    11. Jan Orbie & Viktor Opsomer & Yentyl Williams & Sarah Delputte & Joren Verschaeve, 2021. "Shielded against risk? European donor co‐ordination in Palestine," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(5), pages 703-720, September.
    12. Eziyi O Ibem, 2011. "Assessing Organizational Capacity in Housing Provision: a Survey of Public Housing Agencies in Ogun State, Nigeria," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 2(6), pages 275-285.
    13. Kolavalli, Shashi L. & Birner, Regina & Benin, Samuel & Horowitz, Leah & Babu Suresh Chandra & Asenso-Okyere, Kwadwo & Thompson, Nii Moi & Poku, John, 2009. "Public expenditure and institutional review: Ghana’s ministry of food and agriculture," GSSP working papers 17, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Yoram Z. Haftel & Tobias Lenz, 2022. "Measuring institutional overlap in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 323-347, April.
    15. Stephan Klingebiel & Mario Negre & Pedro Morazán, 2017. "Costs, Benefits and the Political Economy of Aid Coordination: The Case of the European Union," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(1), pages 144-159, January.
    16. Sanderink, Lisa & Nasiritousi, Naghmeh, 2020. "How institutional interactions can strengthen effectiveness: The case of multi-stakeholder partnerships for renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Matilde Luna & José Luis Velasco, 2010. "Knowledge Networks: Integration Mechanisms and Performance Assessment," Chapters, in: Riccardo Viale & Henry Etzkowitz (ed.), The Capitalization of Knowledge, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Igor Guardiancich & Oscar Molina, 2022. "From gradual erosion to revitalization: National Social Dialogue Institutions and policy effectiveness," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(1), pages 85-103, March.
    19. Moser, Fabian & Bump, Jesse B., 2022. "Assessing the World Health Organization: What does the academic debate reveal and is it democratic?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    20. Victoria O. Akpa & Babatunde H. Akinlabi & Priscilla T. Asikhia & Goodluck K. Nnorom, 2020. "Knowledge Management and Performance of Organizations: A Case Study of Selected Food and Beverage Firms," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 3-18.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.