Author
Listed:
- Rajasekhar Thankamony
(Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi, UAE)
- Abdulsalam Husain Al Hashmi
(Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi, UAE / United Arab Emirates University, UAE)
- Hamad Abdulla Al Hammadi
(Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi, UAE)
- Thies Thiemann
(United Arab Emirates University, UAE)
- Abdullah Siddiqui
(Abu Dhabi Quality and Conformity Council, UAE)
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs), defined as plastic particles smaller than 5 mm, have emerged as a global environmental concern owing to their widespread presence and potential adverse effects on marine ecosystems and human health. This study aimed to evaluate the abundance of MPs in the marine environment of Abu Dhabi emirate, UAE, and to identify their possible sources in the marine environment. The investigation focused on sampling sites of four ecologically different categories: sites near oilfields, sites near desalination plants, offshore islands, and reference areas (offshore), with two sites from each category. The MPs were identified and classified based on their size, shape, and color. The average concentrations of MPs in water samples ranged from 4.5 to 12 particles/L and from 2.5 to 11.5 particles/100 g across different categories. Overall, in both water and sediment samples, MPs of size 100–300 μm (61%) were more common than those measuring 300–5000 μm (39%). The most common colors observed were red (32%) in water and transparent (36%) in sediments. Eight distinct shapes were identified in both the sediment and water samples. In water, filaments and irregular shapes were the most prevalent, at 23% each, followed by fragments (20%). In sediments, filaments and rounded shapes dominated by 23% each, followed by irregular shapes (19%). The dominant polymers identified in both water and sediment were acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS), nylon 6,6 (PA66), cellulose acetate (CA), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The Pollution Load Index (PLI) was calculated to assess the pollution levels at different sites. Sites near oilfields and offshore islands were found to be more polluted than sites near desalination plants.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejgeo0:v:6:y:2025:i:4:id:16530
DOI: 10.24018/ejgeo.2025.6.4.530
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejgeo0:v:6:y:2025:i:4:id:16530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejgeo .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.