IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejgeo0/v1y2020i4id16048.html

The Effectiveness of the Semi-Automatic Technique in Extracting Shoreline from Digital Elevation Models for Sustainable Development in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Mitchell Ayemere Eboigbe
  • Amos I Ugwuoti
  • Anthony A. Sam

Abstract

The accurate delineation of Shorelines is required to determine the respective tidal heights and monitor coastal erosion. In some coastlines, the difference between the high tide and the low tide could be as small as one meter but the accurate extraction of the respective vertical surfaces is required to understand the pattern of the sea wave energy and to chart tidal heights relative to a specific datum. The manual digitizing of shoreline is usually with high accuracies and flexibilities but could be rigorous and hectic especially for longer shorelines. Automatic extraction is more feasible where the wavelength intensity gradient within a sub-pixel level is at maximum for instantaneous shorelines with small tidal range. This is due to topological inconsistencies that could hinder such accuracies. In this study, an improved mean shift segmentation model extracts shorelines from digital elevation models from LiDAR and a UAV survey. The key element of an accurate DTM is the contouring network capable of delineating between the grid pixels each representing water and land whose elevation is below or above tidal datum. The study locations are the Freshwater and the Perranporth bay in the United Kingdom. The third is the Nigeria Maritime Academy Oron shoreline. The choice for the different study areas is to ascertain the reliability of this technique on different geographies. Comparison between manual digitizing and the mean shift segmentation were both by visual interpretation and by volumetric change analysis for two different years. The results obtained indicate that the mean shift segmentation can delineate tide-coordinated shorelines accurately. The limitation of this methodology is on digital images with poor spectral resolution. Recommendations include the use of this technique on open source GIS software and a practical solution to developing a monitoring infrastructure for coastlines in Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitchell Ayemere Eboigbe & Amos I Ugwuoti & Anthony A. Sam, 2020. "The Effectiveness of the Semi-Automatic Technique in Extracting Shoreline from Digital Elevation Models for Sustainable Development in Africa," European Journal of Environment and Earth Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 1(4), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejgeo0:v:1:y:2020:i:4:id:16048
    DOI: 10.24018/ejgeo.2020.1.4.48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejgeo/article/view/16048
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejgeo/article/download/16048/3752
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejgeo.2020.1.4.48?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yordan P Raykov & Alexis Boukouvalas & Fahd Baig & Max A Little, 2016. "What to Do When K-Means Clustering Fails: A Simple yet Principled Alternative Algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Yun Zhang & Xueming Li & Jianli Zhang & Derui Song, 2013. "A Study on Coastline Extraction and Its Trend Based on Remote Sensing Image Data Mining," Abstract and Applied Analysis, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-6, April.
    3. Yun Zhang & Xueming Li & Jianli Zhang & Derui Song, 2013. "A Study on Coastline Extraction and Its Trend Based on Remote Sensing Image Data Mining," Abstract and Applied Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2013(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maksymilian Mądziel, 2024. "Modeling Exhaust Emissions in Older Vehicles in the Era of New Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Omer Ajmal & Shahzad Mumtaz & Humaira Arshad & Abdullah Soomro & Tariq Hussain & Razaz Waheeb Attar & Ahmed Alhomoud, 2024. "Enhanced Parameter Estimation of DENsity CLUstEring (DENCLUE) Using Differential Evolution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-46, September.
    3. Joaquín Pérez-Ortega & Nelva Nely Almanza-Ortega & David Romero, 2018. "Balancing effort and benefit of K-means clustering algorithms in Big Data realms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Kutupoğlu, Volkan & Amarouche, Khalid & Akpınar, Adem & Otay, Emre N., 2025. "Wave energy resource classification based on multivariate clustering for the Mediterranean and Black Sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    5. Seungwon Jung & Jaeuk Moon & Eenjun Hwang, 2020. "Cluster-Based Analysis of Infectious Disease Occurrences Using Tensor Decomposition: A Case Study of South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Tan, Daniel & Suvarna, Manu & Shee Tan, Yee & Li, Jie & Wang, Xiaonan, 2021. "A three-step machine learning framework for energy profiling, activity state prediction and production estimation in smart process manufacturing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    7. Mayra Z Rodriguez & Cesar H Comin & Dalcimar Casanova & Odemir M Bruno & Diego R Amancio & Luciano da F Costa & Francisco A Rodrigues, 2019. "Clustering algorithms: A comparative approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-34, January.
    8. Olejniczak Tomasz, 2021. "Innovativeness of Senior Consumers’ Attitudes – An Attempt to Conduct Segmentation," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 76-91, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejgeo0:v:1:y:2020:i:4:id:16048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejgeo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.