IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejedu0/v5y2024i1id30750.html

Identification of Student Learning Styles in Implementing Differentiation Learning in Thai Islamic Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Sri Satriani
  • Agustan Syamsuddin
  • Nameela Tamanga

Abstract

This study aims to determine students’ learning styles in differentiation learning. The learning styles in question are visual, auditory and kinesthetic. This type of research includes qualitative descriptive. The subjects in this study were 50 students of Eakkapapsasanawich Islamic School Thailand in two classes. This data was obtained through observation, interviews and questionnaires. The results showed that male students had a visual learning style of 48%, an auditory learning style of 25%, and a kinesthetic learning style of 27%. Female students had a visual learning style of 36%, an auditory learning style of 43% and a kinesthetic learning style of 21%. That showed that the learning styles of students in Thai Islamic Schools are very diverse. That is a challenge for teachers in applying differentiation learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Sri Satriani & Agustan Syamsuddin & Nameela Tamanga, 2024. "Identification of Student Learning Styles in Implementing Differentiation Learning in Thai Islamic Schools," European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, European Open Science, vol. 5(1), pages 31-34, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:5:y:2024:i:1:id:30750
    DOI: 10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.1.750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu/article/view/30750
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu/article/download/30750/6154
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.1.750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Joseph & Marlene Thomas & Gerard Simonette & Leela Ramsook, 2013. "The Impact of Differentiated Instruction in a Teacher Education Setting: Successes and Challenges," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(3), pages 1-28, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohd Hasrul Kamarulzaman* & Hazita Azman & Azizah Mohd Zahidi, 2018. "Research Trend in the Practice of Differentiated Instruction," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(12), pages 648-668, 12-2018.
    2. Albert Yu & Jeffrey A. Douglas, 2023. "IRT Models for Learning With Item-Specific Learning Parameters," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(6), pages 866-888, December.
    3. Momdjian, Levon & Manegre, Marni & Gutiérrez-Colón, Mar, 2025. "A study of preservice teachers’ digital competence development: Exploring the role of direct instruction, integrated practice, and modeling," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Ruchita Pangriya & Shobha Pandey, 2024. "Development in rural entrepreneurship and future scope of research: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:5:y:2024:i:1:id:30750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.