IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/develo/v2y2022i4id15127.html

Trained Climate Change Educators: Are Secondary School Pupils Getting Quality Climate Change Education? Views from Teachers and Pupils in Lusaka, Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Kabwe H. Mubanga
  • Kelly Mazyopa
  • Beatrice Chirwa
  • Annie Musonda-Mubanga
  • Rebecca Kayumba

Abstract

Zambia like many other countries has not been spared from the destructive impacts of climate change. Climate change awareness creation is pivotal to adaptation and mitigation strategies. Effective dissemination of knowledge among the citizens during formal school years and later on in teacher training programs is crucial to that end. This paper investigates the quality of climate change education that students receive in secondary schools as well as the adequacy of the content taught from the teachers’ and pupils’ perspectives. It further investigated teachers’ and pupils’ opinions on the effects of embracing compulsory climate change education in secondary schools and teacher training colleges and universities. It is based on responses from secondary school students and teachers in Lusaka District. A descriptive survey design utilizing a structured questionnaire was administered to 152 randomly selected respondents drawn from 8 secondary schools within Lusaka. Data analysis involved chi-square tests and thematic analysis of respondents’ qualitative responses. Results also show that the level of climate change knowledge among secondary school teachers in Lusaka was not significantly low (χ2 = 9.488, n = 152, df = 4). Factors such as tertiary level qualification and teaching subject combination emerged as some of the major reasons for varying degrees of climate change knowledge among teachers and pupils respectively. It was recommended that the Ministry of Education should undertake climate change capacity building among teachers through the introduction of compulsory climate change training programs for all teachers at the college or university level, as well as comprehensive and compulsory climate change subject training at secondary school. Curriculum formulation agencies such Curriculum Development Centre and the Ministry of Education should work with teachers and university lecturers to come up with a detailed but easy-to-understand climate change curriculum content.

Suggested Citation

  • Kabwe H. Mubanga & Kelly Mazyopa & Beatrice Chirwa & Annie Musonda-Mubanga & Rebecca Kayumba, 2022. "Trained Climate Change Educators: Are Secondary School Pupils Getting Quality Climate Change Education? Views from Teachers and Pupils in Lusaka, Zambia," European Journal of Development Studies, European Open Science, vol. 2(4), pages 14-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:develo:v:2:y:2022:i:4:id:15127
    DOI: 10.24018/ejdevelop.2022.2.4.127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdevelop/article/view/15127
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdevelop/article/download/15127/3402
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejdevelop.2022.2.4.127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ann Bostrom & M. Granger Morgan & Baruch Fischhoff & Daniel Read, 1994. "What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? 1. Mental Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(6), pages 959-970, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebecca E. Morss & Julie L. Demuth & Ann Bostrom & Jeffrey K. Lazo & Heather Lazrus, 2015. "Flash Flood Risks and Warning Decisions: A Mental Models Study of Forecasters, Public Officials, and Media Broadcasters in Boulder, Colorado," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(11), pages 2009-2028, November.
    2. Angela Bearth & Marie‐Eve Cousin & Michael Siegrist, 2016. "“The Dose Makes the Poison”: Informing Consumers About the Scientific Risk Assessment of Food Additives," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 130-144, January.
    3. Ariel Malka & Jon A. Krosnick & Gary Langer, 2009. "The Association of Knowledge with Concern About Global Warming: Trusted Information Sources Shape Public Thinking," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 633-647, May.
    4. Ian H. Langford, 2002. "An Existential Approach to Risk Perception," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 101-120, February.
    5. Wen Shi & Haohuan Fu & Peinan Wang & Changfeng Chen & Jie Xiong, 2020. "#Climatechange vs. #Globalwarming: Characterizing Two Competing Climate Discourses on Twitter with Semantic Network and Temporal Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Hayam Elshirbiny & Wokje Abrahamse, 2020. "Public risk perception of climate change in Egypt: a mixed methods study of predictors and implications," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(3), pages 242-254, September.
    7. Richard C. Stedman, 2004. "Risk and Climate Change: Perceptions of Key Policy Actors in Canada," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 1395-1406, October.
    8. David K Sewell & Peter J Rayner & Daniel B Shank & Sophie Guy & Simon D Lilburn & Saam Saber & Yoshihisa Kashima, 2017. "Causal knowledge promotes behavioral self-regulation: An example using climate change dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Melissa Zaksek & Joseph L. Arvai, 2004. "Toward Improved Communication about Wildland Fire: Mental Models Research to Identify Information Needs for Natural Resource Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 1503-1514, December.
    10. Emily H. Walpole & Eric Toman & Melanie Stidham & Robyn Wilson, 2020. "The science and practice of ecological restoration: a mental models analysis of restoration practitioners," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 588-604, December.
    11. A. Skarlatidou & T. Cheng & M. Haklay, 2012. "What Do Lay People Want to Know About the Disposal of Nuclear Waste? A Mental Model Approach to the Design and Development of an Online Risk Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(9), pages 1496-1511, September.
    12. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Ugo Rizzo, 2014. "Moving'diversely'towards'the'green'economy.'CO2'abating'techno organisational'trajectories'and'environmental'policy'in'EU'sectors," SEEDS Working Papers 0914, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised May 2014.
    13. Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier, 2016. "Beliefs, Politics, and Environmental Policy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(2), pages 226-244.
    14. Catherine E. LePrevost & Margaret R. Blanchard & W. Gregory Cope, 2011. "The Pesticide Risk Beliefs Inventory: A Quantitative Instrument for the Assessment of Beliefs about Pesticide Risks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-13, June.
    15. Varun Dutt & Cleotilde Gonzalez, 2012. "Human control of climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 497-518, April.
    16. Julie C. Libarkin & Anne U. Gold & Sara E. Harris & Karen S. McNeal & Ryan P. Bowles, 2018. "A new, valid measure of climate change understanding: associations with risk perception," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 403-416, October.
    17. Moure, M. & Pless, C.-E. & Lovrić, M. & Giurca, A. & Brendel, O. & Zivojinovic, I. & García-Jaca, J. & Chalard, J. & Krajter Ostoić, S. & Sergent, A. & Vuletić, D. & Strange, N., 2026. "Mapping of a field: A systematic review of reviews on forestry and the forest-based sector in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    18. Paul M. Kellstedt & Sammy Zahran & Arnold Vedlitz, 2008. "Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 113-126, February.
    19. Kit Hagemann & Joachim Scholderer, 2007. "Consumer versus Expert Hazard Identification: A Mental Models Study of Mutation-bred Rice," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 449-464, June.
    20. Matthew D. Wood & Ann Bostrom & Todd Bridges & Igor Linkov, 2012. "Cognitive Mapping Tools: Review and Risk Management Needs," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(8), pages 1333-1348, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:develo:v:2:y:2022:i:4:id:15127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdevelop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.