IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v183y2026ics1389934125002722.html

Mapping of a field: A systematic review of reviews on forestry and the forest-based sector in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Moure, M.
  • Pless, C.-E.
  • Lovrić, M.
  • Giurca, A.
  • Brendel, O.
  • Zivojinovic, I.
  • García-Jaca, J.
  • Chalard, J.
  • Krajter Ostoić, S.
  • Sergent, A.
  • Vuletić, D.
  • Strange, N.

Abstract

This study applies PRISMA guidelines to map and analyze trends and patterns in evidence synthesis within the field of Forestry and Forest-based Sector (F&FS). Given the role of evidence synthesis in shaping research priorities and informing policy, the study investigates potential biases in evidence synthesized by examining different forms of synthesis (i.e. systematic and non-systematic), topics covered and geographical distribution of underpinning studies. Following a thorough expert-led classification of F&FS topics, we identified 35,015 reviews from Europe, of which 642 were systematic. Although rapidly growing, systematic literature reviews (SLRs) still account for under 1% of all scientific production in F&FS (∼5% of all evidence synthesis). Reviewed topics are dominated by management, biodiversity and climate change, even though the field is sprawling away from core silviculture themes and into more transdisciplinary issues. However, SLRs are more abundant in health-related and social science topics compared to non-systematic reviews, while syntheses of forest technologies and forest products are underrepresented. We also find an uneven geographical distribution of systematized evidence, South-eastern Europe the least and Mediterranean-Northern-Western Europe the most represented. Factors best explaining observed patterns are investment in Research & Development and economic contribution of value in million US dollars added in the forest sector. Our results show evidence synthesis within the F&FS field comes with structural biases in selected research themes, geographical distribution, and methodological approaches. The resulting partial understanding of the knowledge base may influence not only scientific agendas but also policy priorities, assuming such evidence is taken up by policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Moure, M. & Pless, C.-E. & Lovrić, M. & Giurca, A. & Brendel, O. & Zivojinovic, I. & García-Jaca, J. & Chalard, J. & Krajter Ostoić, S. & Sergent, A. & Vuletić, D. & Strange, N., 2026. "Mapping of a field: A systematic review of reviews on forestry and the forest-based sector in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:183:y:2026:i:c:s1389934125002722
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125002722
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    2. Montserrat Alonso-Sardón & Antonio-J Chamorro & Ignacio Hernández-García & Helena Iglesias-de-Sena & Helena Martín-Rodero & Cristian Herrera & Miguel Marcos & José Antonio Mirón-Canelo, 2015. "Association between Occupational Exposure to Wood Dust and Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Rüdiger Mutz, 2021. "Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Marita Stier-Jarmer & Veronika Throner & Michaela Kirschneck & Gisela Immich & Dieter Frisch & Angela Schuh, 2021. "The Psychological and Physical Effects of Forests on Human Health: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-39, February.
    5. Milojević, Staša, 2015. "Quantifying the cognitive extent of science," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 962-973.
    6. Maja Ahac & Saša Ahac & Stjepan Lakušić, 2021. "Long-Term Sustainability Approach in Road Traffic Noise Wall Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Liang Hu & Win-bin Huang & Yi Bu, 2024. "Interdisciplinary research attracts greater attention from policy documents: evidence from COVID-19," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Bettencourt, Luís M.A. & Kaiser, David I. & Kaur, Jasleen, 2009. "Scientific discovery and topological transitions in collaboration networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 210-221.
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0138237 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Zhaoyuan He & Paul Turner, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Technologies and Industry 4.0 in the Forest Supply Chain: A Framework Identifying Challenges and Opportunities," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife M. & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Hetemäki, L. & D'Amato, D. & Giurca, A. & Hurmekoski, E., 2024. "Synergies and trade-offs in the European forest bioeconomy research: State of the art and the way forward," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Megan Rowley & Raluca Topciu & Matthew Owens, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Mechanisms Underpinning Psychological Change Following Nature Exposure in an Adolescent Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Arzu Tugce Guler & Cathelijn J. F. Waaijer & Magnus Palmblad, 2016. "Scientific workflows for bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 385-398, May.
    15. Matthew J Page & Joanne E McKenzie & Patrick M Bossuyt & Isabelle Boutron & Tammy C Hoffmann & Cynthia D Mulrow & Larissa Shamseer & Jennifer M Tetzlaff & Elie A Akl & Sue E Brennan & Roger Chou & Jul, 2021. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Ann Bostrom & M. Granger Morgan & Baruch Fischhoff & Daniel Read, 1994. "What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? 1. Mental Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(6), pages 959-970, December.
    17. Lovrić, Marko & Lovrić, Nataša & Mavsar, Robert, 2020. "Mapping forest-based bioeconomy research in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    18. Fernando Jiménez-Sáez & Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia & Jose Luis Zofío, 2013. "Who leads research productivity growth? Guidelines for R&D policy-makers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(1), pages 273-303, January.
    19. Martín-Martín, Alberto & Orduna-Malea, Enrique & Thelwall, Mike & Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio, 2018. "Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1160-1177.
    20. Martina K Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K Singh, 2020. "Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 175-194, May.
    21. Daniel Read & Ann Bostrom & M. Granger Morgan & Baruch Fischhoff & Tom Smuts, 1994. "What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? 2. Survey Studies of Educated Laypeople," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(6), pages 971-982, December.
    22. Dave D. White & Amber Y. Wutich & Kelli L. Larson & Tim Lant, 2015. "Water management decision makers' evaluations of uncertainty in a decision support system: the case of WaterSim in the Decision Theater," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 616-630, April.
    23. Weiss, Gerhard & Ludvig, Alice & Živojinović, Ivana, 2020. "Four decades of innovation research in forestry and the forest-based industries – A systematic literature review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    24. Bill Colglazier, 2016. "Encourage governments to heed scientific advice," Nature, Nature, vol. 537(7622), pages 587-587, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabando-Vera, David & Montalván-Burbano, Néstor & Parrales-Guerrero, Katherine & Yonfá-Medranda, Marcela & Plaza-Úbeda, José Antonio, 2025. "Growing a greener future: A bibliometric analysis of green innovation in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Azin Yazdi & Sunder Ramachandran & Hoda Mohsenifard & Khaled Nawaser & Faraz Sasani & Behrooz Gharleghi, 2024. "The Ebb and Flow of Brand Loyalty: A 28-Year Bibliometric and Content Analysis," Papers 2402.13177, arXiv.org.
    3. Monica Martinez-Blasco & Francesc Prior Sanz & Francesc Martori Adrian, 2025. "Mapping innovation tools and financial inclusion: a bibliometric analysis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-36, December.
    4. Tripathy, Prajukta & Jena, Pabitra Kumar & Mishra, Bikash Ranjan, 2024. "Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Rebecca E. Morss & Julie L. Demuth & Ann Bostrom & Jeffrey K. Lazo & Heather Lazrus, 2015. "Flash Flood Risks and Warning Decisions: A Mental Models Study of Forecasters, Public Officials, and Media Broadcasters in Boulder, Colorado," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(11), pages 2009-2028, November.
    6. Juan F. Prados-Castillo & Miguel Ángel Solano-Sánchez & Pilar Guaita Fernández & José Manuel Guaita Martínez, 2023. "Potential of the Crypto Economy in Financial Management and Fundraising for Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Angela Bearth & Marie‐Eve Cousin & Michael Siegrist, 2016. "“The Dose Makes the Poison”: Informing Consumers About the Scientific Risk Assessment of Food Additives," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 130-144, January.
    8. Zoltán Lakner & Brigitta Plasek & Gyula Kasza & Anna Kiss & Sándor Soós & Ágoston Temesi, 2021. "Towards Understanding the Food Consumer Behavior–Food Safety–Sustainability Triangle: A Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    9. Zhichao Wang & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "Performance Analysis of Hospitals in Australia and its Peers: A Systematic Review," CEPA Working Papers Series WP012021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    10. Zhichao Wang & Bao Hoang Nguyen & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2024. "Performance analysis of hospitals in Australia and its peers: a systematic and critical review," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 139-173, October.
    11. Mishra, Biswaksen & Singh, Rajesh Kr & Mishra, Ruchi & Demirkol, Denizhan & Daim, Tugrul, 2025. "Blockchain adoption in automotive supply chain: A systematic literature review amalgamated with bibliometric analysis technique and future research directions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Borozan, Miloš & Loreta, Cannito & Riccardo, Palumbo, 2022. "Eye-tracking for the study of financial decision-making: A systematic review of the literature," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    13. Zamani, Mehdi & Yalcin, Haydar & Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zeba, Gordana & Daim, Tugrul U, 2022. "Developing metrics for emerging technologies: identification and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Ugo Rizzo, 2014. "Moving'diversely'towards'the'green'economy.'CO2'abating'techno organisational'trajectories'and'environmental'policy'in'EU'sectors," SEEDS Working Papers 0914, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised May 2014.
    15. David P Baker & Abdul Basit Adeel & Juan José Moradel-Vásquez & Bea Treena Macasaet & Justin J. W. Powell & Julian Prieto & Jennifer Dusdal & Jun Pang & Yuan Chih Fu, 2026. "Deepening and broadening knowledge after the PISA scientific event: bibliometric, semantic network, and expert analyses of scientization in education research," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier, 2016. "Beliefs, Politics, and Environmental Policy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(2), pages 226-244.
    17. Md. Nazmus Sakib & Shah Ridwan Chowdhury & Mohammad Younus & Nehad Laila Sanju & Farhana Foysal Satata & Mahafuza Islam, 2024. "How HR analytics evolved over time: a bibliometric analysis on Scopus database," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Zohreh Ali Esmaeili & Yaser Sobhanifard, 2025. "Navigating the Sustainable Business Model: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis at the Intersection of Circular Economy and Innovation Management in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(8), pages 6825-6861, December.
    19. Mohammed H. Alzard & Hilal El-Hassan & Tamer El-Maaddawy & Marwa Alsalami & Fatma Abdulrahman & Ashraf Aly Hassan, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Studies on Self-Healing Concrete Published between 1974 and 2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Weiss, Gerhard & Hansen, Eric & Ludvig, Alice & Nybakk, Erlend & Toppinen, Anne, 2021. "Innovation governance in the forest sector: Reviewing concepts, trends and gaps," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:183:y:2026:i:c:s1389934125002722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.