IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/clinic/v5y2024i3id12341.html

Self-Efficacy and Determinants of Newborn Resuscitation Practices among Healthcare Professionals in Chipata District, Eastern Province, Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Mwanida Daka

    (Mwami College of Nursing and Midwifery, Zambia)

  • Anatolii Tsarkov

    (University of Zambia, Zambia)

  • Petro Petlovanyi

    (University of Zambia, Zambia)

  • Maureen Masumo Makoleka

    (University of Zambia, Zambia)

  • Gabriel Lungu

    (Ministry of Health (Headquarters), Zambia)

  • Gabriel Mpundu

    (Levy Mwanawasa University Teaching Hospital, Zambia)

  • Estella Mukuka Chanda

    (Levy Mwanawasa Medical University, Zambia)

  • Crecious Phiri

    (Levy Mwanawasa Medical University, Zambia)

Abstract

Background: Effective newborn resuscitation in healthcare institutions depends on factors like supervisor support, knowledge, availability of functional equipment, and self-efficacy of healthcare professionals. This study investigated self-efficacy and related factors in newborn resuscitation among healthcare professionals in Chipata District Health facilities. Methodology: This cross-sectional study involved 85 healthcare professionals selected through simple random sampling. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire on self-efficacy for newborn resuscitation, completed after obtaining consent. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 21, employing Pearson chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. A multivariate binary logistic regression model analyzed associated factors, with significance set at p

Suggested Citation

  • Mwanida Daka & Anatolii Tsarkov & Petro Petlovanyi & Maureen Masumo Makoleka & Gabriel Lungu & Gabriel Mpundu & Estella Mukuka Chanda & Crecious Phiri, 2024. "Self-Efficacy and Determinants of Newborn Resuscitation Practices among Healthcare Professionals in Chipata District, Eastern Province, Zambia," European Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Open Science, vol. 5(3), pages 22-31, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:5:y:2024:i:3:id:12341
    DOI: 10.24018/clinicmed.2024.5.3.341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/view/12341
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/download/12341/2589
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/clinicmed.2024.5.3.341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:5:y:2024:i:3:id:12341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.